Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
- PMID: 17024497
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0418-8
Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
Abstract
To compare the visibility of anatomical details and prostate cancer local staging performance of pelvic phased-array coil and integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil MR imaging, with histologic analysis serving as the reference standard. MR imaging was performed in 81 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer, prior to radical prostatectomy, on a 1.5T scanner. T2-weighted fast spin echo images of the prostate were obtained using phased-array coil and endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Prospectively, one radiologist, retrospectively, two radiologists and two less experienced radiologists working in consensus, evaluated and scored all endorectal-pelvic phased-array imaging, with regard to visibility of anatomical details and local staging. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed. Anatomical details of the overall prostate were significantly better evaluated using the endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil setup (P<0.05). The overall local staging accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the pelvic phased-array coil was 59% (48/81), 56% (20/36) and 62% (28/45), and for the endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils 83% (67/81), 64% (23/36) and 98% (44/45) respectively, for the prospective reader. Accuracy and specificity were significantly better with endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils (P<0.05). The overall staging accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the retrospective readers were 78-79% (P<0.05), 56-58% and 96%, for the endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Area under the ROC curve (Az) was significantly higher for endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils (Az=0.74) compared to pelvic phased-array coil (Az=0.57), for the prospective reader. The use of endorectal-pelvic phased array coils resulted in significant improvement of anatomic details, extracapsular extension accuracy and specificity. Overstaging is reduced significantly with equal sensitivity when an endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil is used.
Similar articles
-
Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils.Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):703-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972810. Radiology. 1994. PMID: 7972810 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.Yonsei Med J. 2012 May;53(3):550-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.3.550. Yonsei Med J. 2012. PMID: 22476999 Free PMC article.
-
Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers.Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):541-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041724. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 16244263
-
[MRI and staging evaluation of prostate cancer].J Radiol. 2006 Feb;87(2 Pt 2):228-43. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(06)73997-x. J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16484948 Review. French.
-
[Staging and tissue characterization of prostate carcinoma: role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopy].Hinyokika Kiyo. 2000 Nov;46(11):855-9. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2000. PMID: 11193312 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging before and after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.J Endourol. 2008 Apr;22(4):789-94. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9822. J Endourol. 2008. PMID: 18366322 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Oct;10(10):589-97. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.196. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Nat Rev Urol. 2013. PMID: 24061532 Review.
-
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Jan;18(1):71-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f19d01. Curr Opin Urol. 2008. PMID: 18090494 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2201-10. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2475-5. Epub 2012 Jun 3. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22661019 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for detecting uni- and bilateral extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2015 Jul;33(7):1015-21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1362-x. Epub 2014 Jul 25. World J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25059766 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical