Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;18(6):603-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0214-7. Epub 2006 Oct 6.

Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women

Affiliations

Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women

Lingling Lei et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between biomechanical properties and the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) through analysis on biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue. The biopsy specimens were obtained from 43 patients undergoing transvaginal hysterectomy, who were assigned into premenopausal POP, postmenopausal POP, premenopausal control and postmenopausal control groups. Tissue specimens were biomechanically assessed by a purpose-built tissue puller system, and stress-strain curves were digitally recorded. The Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, maximum elongation, maximum fracture of vaginal tissue were 9.45 +/- 0.70, 0.43 +/- 0.01, 1.50 +/- 0.02, 0.60 +/- 0.02 in premenopausal POP group; 12.10 +/- 1.10, 0.39 +/- 0.01, 1.14 +/- 0.05, 0.27 +/- 0.03 in postmenopausal POP group; 6.65 +/- 1.48, 0.46 +/- 0.01, 1.68 +/- 0.11, 0.79 +/- 0.05 in premenopausal control group and 10.26 +/- 1.10, 0.42 +/- 0.01, 1.37 +/- 0.04, 0.42 +/- 0.03 in postmenopausal control group. There was significant difference in biomechanical properties between premenopausal POP group and premenopausal control group (p < 0.01). There was significant difference in biomechanical properties between postmenopausal POP group and postmenopausal control group (p < 0.01). Biomechanical properties in POP group were significantly lower than that in control group, suggesting that degeneration of biomechanical properties in pelvic support construction might lead to the occurrence of POP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Reprod Med. 2002 Mar;47(3):231-4 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Feb 10;112(2):201-5 - PubMed
    1. Med Eng Phys. 1998 Jun;20(4):308-14 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun;17(4):340-5 - PubMed

Publication types