Lip shape and position in Class II division 2 malocclusion
- PMID: 17029504
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0739:LSAPIC]2.0.CO;2
Lip shape and position in Class II division 2 malocclusion
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether differences exist in the shape and position of the lips between Class II division 2 and Class I malocclusions.
Materials and methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects with Class II division 2 (n = 30) and Class I (n = 30) incisor relationships were scanned at 300 dpi to produce digital images. These were subsequently digitized in random order. Twenty-one landmarks characterizing the upper and lower lips and the maxillary and mandibular central incisors were digitized. Procrustes algorithms optimally superimposed the landmark configurations to standardize size, location, and orientation. Discriminant analysis of the principal components of shape determined the differences between the Class II division 2 and Class I groups.
Results: The shape and position of the upper and lower lips differed significantly between the Class II division 2 group and the Class I group (P < .001). Principal component (PC) 1 (46% of the variance) involved an increase in the thickness of the upper and lower lips in the Class II division 2 group. PC2 (11% of the variance) was characterized by a relatively higher lip line in the Class II division 2 group.
Conclusions: The shape and position of the lips differ between Class II division 2 and Class I malocclusions.
Similar articles
-
Crown-root shape of the permanent maxillary central incisor.Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):710-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0710:CSOTPM>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2003. PMID: 14719737
-
An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2002 Oct;72(5):456-63. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0456:AIITRB>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2002. PMID: 12401055
-
[Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1980 Jun;39(2):176-85. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1980. PMID: 6935310 Japanese. No abstract available.
-
[Glossoplasty: hope and pre-orthodontic support?].Orthod Fr. 1992;63 Pt 2:455-68. Orthod Fr. 1992. PMID: 1341732 Review. French.
-
Cephalometric analysis of Deutero-Malay Indonesians.Aust Dent J. 1995 Dec;40(6):381-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb04837.x. Aust Dent J. 1995. PMID: 8615744 Review.
Cited by
-
Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):305-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24582022 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior alveolar bone and tooth inclination in different skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1210. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06537-7. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40684175 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Dentofacial Angles in Children with Severe Adenoid Hypertrophy.Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;36(5):587-593. doi: 10.22038/ijorl.2024.77257.3584. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39323500 Free PMC article.
-
Controlling incisor torque with completely customized lingual appliances.J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Sep;81(5):328-339. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00231-9. Epub 2020 May 29. J Orofac Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32472341 Free PMC article.