Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Oct;131(4):1064-72.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.021. Epub 2006 Aug 16.

Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures

Laura E Moreno Luna  1 , Benjamin Kipp, Kevin C Halling, Thomas J Sebo, Walter K Kremers, Lewis R Roberts, Emily G Barr Fritcher, Michael J Levy, Gregory J Gores
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures

Laura E Moreno Luna et al. Gastroenterology. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background & aims: Two advanced cytologic techniques for detecting aneuploidy-digital image analysis (DIA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-have recently been developed to help identify malignant pancreatobiliary strictures. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of cytology, DIA, and FISH for the identification of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.

Methods: Brush cytologic specimens from 233 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary strictures were examined by all 3 (cytology, DIA, and FISH) techniques. Strictures were stratified as proximal (n = 33) or distal (n = 114) based on whether they occurred above or below the cystic duct, respectively. Strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 86) were analyzed separately.

Results: Despite the stratification, the performances of the tests were similar. Conventional cytology has a low sensitivity (4%-20%) but 100% specificity. Because of the high specificity for cytology, we assessed the performance of the other tests when conventional cytology was negative. In this clinical context, FISH had an increased sensitivity (35%-60%) when assessing for chromosomal gains (polysomy) while preserving the specificity of cytology. The sensitivity and specificity of DIA was intermediate as compared with routine cytology and FISH but was additive to FISH values demonstrating only trisomy of chromosome 7 or chromosome 3.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that FISH and DIA increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant pancreatobiliary tract strictures over that obtained by conventional cytology while maintaining an acceptable specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stewart CJ, Mills PR, Carter R, O'Donohue J, Fullarton G, Imrie CW, Murray WR. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures: a review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:449–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim HJ, Lee KT, Kim SH, Lee JK, Lim JH, Paik SW, Rhee JC. Differential diagnosis of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation without demonstrable mass on ultrasonography or CT: benign versus malignancy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1287–92. - PubMed
    1. Rosch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E, Meining A, Born P, Weigert N, Allescher HD, Classen M, Barbur M, Schenck U, Werner M. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:390–6. - PubMed
    1. De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Cramer H, Chappo J, McHenry L, Jr, Watkins JL, Lehman GA. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 1) Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:552–61. - PubMed
    1. Nichols JC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH, Nagorney DM, Ritts RE., Jr Diagnostic role of serum CA 19-9 for cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68:874–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms