Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;134(Pt 1):69-82.
doi: 10.1017/S0031182006001259. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

Domestic dogs and cats as sources of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rural northwestern Argentina

Affiliations

Domestic dogs and cats as sources of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rural northwestern Argentina

R E Gürtler et al. Parasitology. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

The reservoir capacity of domestic cats and dogs for Trypanosoma cruzi infection and the host-feeding patterns of domestic Triatoma infestans were assessed longitudinally in 2 infested rural villages in north-western Argentina. A total of 86 dogs and 38 cats was repeatedly examined for T. cruzi infection by serology and/or xenodiagnosis. The composite prevalence of infection in dogs (60%), but not in cats, increased significantly with age and with the domiciliary density of infected T. infestans. Dogs and cats had similarly high forces of infection, prevalence of infectious hosts (41-42%), and infectiousness to bugs at a wide range of infected bug densities. The infectiousness to bugs of seropositive dogs declined significantly with increasing dog age and was highly aggregated. Individual dog infectiousness to bugs was significantly autocorrelated over time. Domestic T. infestans fed on dogs showed higher infection prevalence (49%) than those fed on cats (39%), humans (38%) or chickens (29%) among 1085 bugs examined. The basic reproduction number of T. cruzi in dogs was at least 8.2. Both cats and dogs are epidemiologically important sources of infection for bugs and householders, dogs nearly 3 times more than cats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Age-specific prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs, as determined through the composite results of serodiagnosis and xenodiagnosis (A), and relationship with the density of domestic T. infestans infected with T. cruzi (B). Trinidad and Mercedes, September and December 1988, respectively. The line in (A) is the fit of the catalytic model with constant force of infection over time and age. Numbers close to data points represent the numbers of dogs examined for infection.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Age-specific prevalence of dogs seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi and infectious to bugs (A) and percentage of xenodiagnosis bugs infected with T. cruzi after taking a single bloodmeal on seropositive dogs (infectiousness to bugs) (B). Trinidad and Mercedes, September and December 1988, respectively. Numbers close to data points in (A) represent the numbers of seropositive dogs examined by xenodiagnosis, or numbers of xenodiagnosis bugs examined for infection. Each symbol in (B) represents the percentage of bugs fed on a single dog.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency distributions of individual infectiousness to bugs of all dogs seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi at 3 survey dates, September—December 1988, March 1989 and September 1989 (A); and individual infectiousness to bugs of dogs that were ever seropositive for T. cruzi and tested on 2 or 3 occasions (B). Trinidad and Mercedes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Age-specific prevalence of infectious hosts in the dog and cat populations, assessed by xenodiagnosis, regardless of serological data. Trinidad and Mercedes, September and December 1988, respectively. Numbers close to data points represent the numbers of hosts examined by xenodiagnosis.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Association between Trypanosoma cruzi infection and host bloodmeal source in 1085 domestic T. infestans collected in Trinidad, Mercedes and Amamá from 1988 to 1992, which were examined for T. cruzi infection. Numbers on top of bars represent bloodmeals identified on each host blood source.

References

    1. Alencar JE, Almeida YM, Santos AR, Freitas LM. Epidemiology of Chagas’ disease in the state of Ceará, Brazil. IV. The role of dogs and cats as domestic reservoirs. Revista Brasileira de Malariología e Doenças Tropicales. 19741975;26/27:5–26. - PubMed
    1. Araújo FMG, Bahia MT, Magalhães NM, Martins-Filho OA, Veloso VM, Carneiro CM, Tafuri WL, Lana M. Follow-up of experimental chronic Chagas’ disease in dogs: use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) compared with parasitological and serological methods. Acta Tropica. 2002;81:21–31. - PubMed
    1. Barretto MP. Estudos sôbre reservatórios e vectores silvestres do “Trypanosoma cruzi”. XXXI. Observações sôbre a associação entre reservatórios e vectores, com especial referência à região nordeste do Estado de Sao Paulo. Revista Brasileña Biología. 1968;28:481–494. - PubMed
    1. Basombrío MA, Segura MA, Mora MC, Gomez L. Field trial of vaccination against American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease) in dogs. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1993;49:143–151. - PubMed
    1. Beard CB, Pye G, Steurer FJ, Rodriguez R, Campman R, Peterson AT, Ramsey J, Wirtz RA, Robinson LE. Chagas disease in a domestic transmission cycle, southern Texas, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2003;9:103–105. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms