Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2007 Apr;23(2):143-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-006-9148-x. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

Sustainability in the cardiac cath lab

Affiliations
Editorial

Sustainability in the cardiac cath lab

Eugenio Picano et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Use of radiation for medical examinations and test is the largest man-made source of radiation exposure. Interventional procedures are only 2% of all radiological procedures, but contribute to about 20% of the total collective dose per head per year. On average, a left ventriculography and coronary angiography corresponds to a radiation exposure for the patient of about 300, a coronary stent to 1,000, a peripheral artery intervention to 1,500 to 2,500, and a cardiac radiofrequency ablation to 900-1,500 chest x-rays. Invasive cardiology procedures increased tenfold in the last ten years and growth in the field has been accompanied by concern for the safety of the staff. Interventional cardiologists have an exposure per-head per year two- to three times higher than that of radiologists, with an annual exposure equivalent to around 250 chest x-rays per head. A reduction of occupational doses by a factor of ten can be achieved simply by and intensive training program. The awareness of radiation effects may be suboptimal in the medical community. It is recommended by professional guidelines and reinforced by the European law that the responsibility of all physicians is to minimize the radiation injury hazard to their patients, to their professional staff and to themselves.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1712-4 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1840-5 - PubMed
    1. Mutat Res. 2006 Aug 30;600(1-2):58-66 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2004 Jan 31;363(9406):345-51 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):11-25 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources