Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;114(10):1626-9.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.9005.

Supplementing the traditional institutional review board with an environmental health and community review board

Steven G Gilbert  1
Affiliations

Supplementing the traditional institutional review board with an environmental health and community review board

Steven G Gilbert. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Community-based research often involves additional ethical, legal, and social considerations beyond those of the specific individuals involved in the study. The traditional institutional review board (IRB) typically focuses on protecting the rights and ensuring the safety of the individuals involved. For projects involving community members, IRBs should be more sensitive to issues related to the broader community concerns.

Objectives: The objective of this article is to discuss the concept of community-based participatory research and the shortcomings of the traditional IRBs in dealing with ethical issues associated with broader community concerns such as implications for family members, neighborhood groups, and local businesses. I examine the rationale and benefits for expanding the roles and responsibilities of review boards related to community-based issues.

Discussion: I propose the development of environmental health and community review boards (EHCRBs) that combine the fundamental responsibilities and ethical concept of the traditional review boards with an expanded ethical construct of dignity, veracity, sustainability, and justice, with an added emphasis on community.

Conclusions: Only by acknowledging the needs of and working with the community can we ensure ethically based and socially responsible research. An EHCRB will allow researchers and community members to more fully address their mutual interest in conducting scientific, ethical, and socially responsible research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key elements of EHCRBs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Dearry A. Farmworker pesticide exposure and community-based participatory research: rationale and practical applications. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(suppl 3):429–434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Russell GB. Pesticide safety among farmworkers: perceived risk and perceived control as factors reflecting environmental justice. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(suppl 2):233–240. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arquette M, Cole M, Cook K, LaFrance B, Peters M, Ransom J, et al. Holistic risk-based environmental decision making: a Native perspective. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(suppl 2):259–264. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. 1994. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. New York:Oxford University Press.
    1. Brown P, Zavestoski S, McCormick S, Mayer B, Morello-Frosch R, Gasior Altman R. Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health. Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26(1):50–80. - PubMed