Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct 16:6:252.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-252.

Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial

Affiliations

Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial

Ahti Anttila et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes.

Methods/design: We present here a randomised evaluation trial design integrated to the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, in order to evaluate renewal of the programme using emerging technological alternatives. The main aim of the evaluation is to assess screening effectiveness, using subsequent cancers as the outcome and screen-detected pre-cancers as surrogates. For the time being, approximately 863,000 women have been allocated to automation-assisted cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, or to conventional cytology within the organised screening programme. Follow-up results on subsequent cervical cancers will become available during 2007-2015.

Discussion: Large-scale randomised trials are useful to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness issues of the most important technological alternatives in the screening programmes for cervical cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated age-standardised death rates and numbers of deaths from cervical cancers in European regions (Globocan 2002); a) Age-adjusted (ASR(W)) mortality rate from cervical cancer in Europe, and b) Numbers of deaths from cervical cancer in Europe.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hakama M. Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. In: K. M, editor. Trends in Cancer Incidence. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1982. pp. 279–292.
    1. Laara E, Day NE, Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet. 1987;1:1247–9. - PubMed
    1. Sasieni P, Cuzick J, Farmery E. Accelerated decline in cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales. Lancet. 1995;346:1566–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92099-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankila R, Demaret E, Hakama M, Lynge E, Schouten LJ, Parkin DM, editors . Evaluation and monitoring od screening programmes. Brussels: European Comission, Europe Against Cancer Programme; 2001.
    1. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet. 2004;364:249–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16674-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms