Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;64(5):313-9.
doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.023861. Epub 2006 Oct 16.

Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder

Affiliations

Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder

B M A Huisstede et al. Occup Environ Med. 2007 May.

Abstract

Background: There is no universally accepted way of labelling or defining upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A variety of names are used and many different classification systems have been introduced.

Objective: To agree on an "unambiguous language" concerning the terminology and classification that can be used by all relevant medical and paramedical disciplines in the Netherlands.

Methods: A Delphi consensus strategy was initiated. The outcomes of a multidisciplinary conference were used as a starting point. In total, 47 experts in the field of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders were delegated by 11 medical and paramedical professional associations to form the expert panel for the Delphi consensus strategy. Each Delphi round consisted of a questionnaire, an analysis and a feedback report.

Results: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved. The experts reported the consensus in a model. This so-called CANS model describes the term, definition and classification of complaints of arm, neck and/or shoulder (CANS) and helps professionals to classify patients unambiguously. CANS is defined as "musculoskeletal complaints of arm, neck and/or shoulder not caused by acute trauma or by any systemic disease". The experts classified 23 disorders as specific CANS, because they were judged as diagnosable disorders. All other complaints were called non-specific CANS. In addition, the experts defined "alert symptoms" on the top of the model.

Conclusions: The use of the CANS model can increase accurate and meaningful communication among healthcare workers, and may also have a positive influence on the quality of scientific research, by enabling comparison of data of different studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Walker‐Bone K E, Palmer K T, Reading I.et al Criteria for assessing pain and nonarticular soft‐tissue rheumatic disorders of the neck and upper limb. Semin Arthritis Rheum 200333168–184. - PubMed
    1. Konijnenberg H S, de Wilde N S, Gerritsen A A.et al Conservative treatment for repetitive strain injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 200127299–310. - PubMed
    1. Huisstede B M, Bierma‐Zeinstra S M, Koes B W.et al Incidence and prevalence of upper‐extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 200677 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Eerd D, Beaton D, Cole D.et al Classification systems for upper‐limb musculoskeletal disorders in workers: a review of the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 200356925–936. - PubMed
    1. Harrington J M, Carter J T, Birrell L.et al Surveillance case definitions for work‐ related upper limb pain syndromes. Occup Environ Med 199855264–271. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types