Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;18(7):773-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0224-5. Epub 2006 Oct 17.

Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani muscle defects with magnetic resonance images

Affiliations

Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani muscle defects with magnetic resonance images

Daniel M Morgan et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine interrater reliability of assessing pubovisceral levator ani muscle defects with magnetic resonance images. Normal pubovisceral muscle was assigned a grade of 0; PVM defects were graded as mild=1 (less than half missing), moderate=2 (more than half missing), and severe=3 (total or near total loss). Among six pairs of examiners, percent agreement and weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to determine agreement between pairs of examiners and among all examiners (i.e., "overall"). For unilateral scoring, exact agreement was found in 83.7%, and differences of one, two, and three grades were found in 14.7, 1.5, and 0.1%, respectively. For bilateral scoring, exact agreement and differences of one, two and three grades were found in 75.4, 15.9, 6.9, and 1.6%, respectively. Thus, exact agreement or a one-point difference was reached in 91.3% of cases. When defect status was categorized as none/normal, minor, and major, the overall weighted kappa coefficient was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83, 0.89). There was variation among examiner pairs with unilateral (p=0.002) and bilateral (p=0.02) scoring, but not when defect status was categorized as none/normal, minor, and major (p=0.59). There was agreement to within one point in 91% of cases when six examiner pairs scored levator ani defects on a seven-point scale. Examiner pairs discriminated injury similarly when defect status was categorized as normal/none, minor, or major.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of grade 1, 2, and 3 unilateral defects in axial images at the level of the midurethra. The urethra (U), vagina (V), and rectum (R) are labeled in the middlepanel of the figure. The blackarrow in each panel points to the left pubovisceral muscle in which there is loss of muscle bulk in comparison to the normal contralateral side

References

    1. Hoyte L, Jakab M, Warfield SK, Shott S, Flesh G, Fielding JR. Levator ani thickness variations in symptomatic and asymptomatic women using magnetic resonance-based 3-dimensional color mapping. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:856–861. - PubMed
    1. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:707–712. - PubMed
    1. DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:46–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:144–149. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tunn R, Delancey JO, Howard D, Ashton-Miller JA, Quint LE. Anatomic variations in the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in nulliparas evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:116–121. - PubMed

Publication types