Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2006 Oct 17:3:35.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-35.

Skin-sparing mastectomy and radiotherapy: an update

Affiliations
Editorial

Skin-sparing mastectomy and radiotherapy: an update

Ramia Mokbel et al. Int Semin Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Despite the lack of randomised controlled trials and paucity of the published data, the current evidence suggests that the post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) does not represent a contraindication to skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in the multidisciplinary setting. Although PMRT is associated with a higher incidence of complications, a satisfactory cosmetic outcome can be achieved in most patients. Radiation has a deleterious effect on autologous flap reconstruction that relies on fat for volume replacement such as the deep inferior epi-gastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction and this method of reconstruction should be delayed until RT is completed. Until better methods of RT delivery are developed to minimise complications, women at high risk of requiring PMRT, can be safely offered SSM and IBR with a sub-pectoral saline-filled tissue expander and this can be replaced with a permanent prosthesis or converted into an autologous flap reconstruction after the completion of RT. Any capsule formation can be surgically treated at this stage. This new concept, known as immediate-delayed reconstruction, can avoid the cosmetic and RT delivery problems that can occur after IBR.Furthermore, prior RT does not represent a contra-indication to SSM and IBR, however it increases the incidence of complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This 47 year old woman had left SSM and immediate latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction for node-positive breast cancer (T2N1M0). She subsequently had chemotherapy and RT. Thereafter, she had capsulotomy and nipple reconstruction using a local flap.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1014–25. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010. discussion 1026–7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunnick G, Mokbel K. Oncological considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2006;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Recht A, Edge SB. Evidence-based indications for post-mastectomy irradiation. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:995–1013. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00033-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hussien M, Salah B, Malyon A, Wieler-Mithoff EM. The effect of radiotherapy on the use of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:490–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM. Advances and surgical decision-making for breast reconstruction. Cancer. 107:893–907. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22079. 2006 Jul 21. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources