Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;31(5):383-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.024.

Identifying sedentary subgroups: the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey

Audie A Atienza  1 , Amy L Yaroch, Louise C Mãsse, Richard P Moser, Bradford W Hesse, Abby C King
Affiliations

Identifying sedentary subgroups: the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey

Audie A Atienza et al. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Developing effective interventions for the 24% to 28% of U.S. adults who are sedentary requires a better understanding of the factors related to sedentary lifestyles as well as the communication channels to reach various subgroups. This study identified key sociodemographic and health communication characteristics of various subgroups with high rates of inactivity using signal detection methodology.

Methods: The sample from the nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey 2003 (n=6369) was randomly split into two samples. Exploratory analyses (conducted 2004 and 2005) were employed on the first sample to identify various subgroups, and the stability of inactivity rates in those subgroups was examined in the second sample.

Results: Eight subgroups with varying levels of inactivity were identified. Three subgroups had inactivity levels of 40% or higher, while the lowest subgroup had a level of less than 15%. The highest inactivity subgroup consisted of individuals with at least some college education who were in fair/poor health and who watched 4 or more hours of television per day. The second-highest inactivity subgroup was composed of those without a college education who tended not to use or attend to many communication channels. The third highest inactive subgroup consisted of those without a college education who read the newspaper and were obese. Levels of inactivity in the second independent sample subgroups were not significantly different from those found in the exploratory sample.

Conclusions: This study identified empirically based, physically inactive subgroups that differed on sociodemographic and health communication characteristics. This information should be useful in creating future evidence-based, targeted, and tailored intervention strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No financial conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Signal detection analysis for inactivity, Sample 1 CA, cancer
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stability of inactivity rates by subgroup, Samples 1 vs. 2 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test =0.35; p =0.55
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Eyre H, Kahn R, Robertson RM, et al. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;109(25):3244–55. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
    1. Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, Obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(8):579–91. - PubMed
    1. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1625–638. - PubMed
    1. IARC Working Group. IARC Handbook of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 6. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002. IARC Working Group on the evaluation of cancer-preventive strategies.

LinkOut - more resources