Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Apr;56(4):545-52.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.096883. Epub 2006 Oct 17.

Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Review

Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial

Jean-Marc Dumonceau et al. Gut. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: In chronic pancreatitis, obstruction of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) may contribute to the pathogenesis of pain. Pilot studies suggest that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) alone relieves pain in calcified chronic pancreatitis.

Aim: To compare ESWL alone with ESWL and endoscopic drainage of the MPD for treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

Subjects: Patients with uncomplicated painful chronic pancreatitis and calcifications obstructing the MPD.

Methods: 55 patients were randomised to ESWL alone (n = 26) or ESWL combined with endoscopy (n = 29).

Results: 2 years after trial intervention, 10 (38%) and 13 (45%) patients of the ESWL alone and ESWL combined with endoscopy group, respectively, had presented pain relapse (primary outcome) (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.23 to 2.57). In both groups, a similar decrease was seen after treatment in the MPD diameter (mean decrease 1.7 mm; 95% CI 0.9 to 2.6; p<0.001), and in the number of pain episodes/year (mean decrease, 3.7; 95% CI 2.6 to 4.9; p<0.001). Treatment costs per patient were three times higher in the ESWL combined with endoscopy group compared with the ESWL alone group (p = 0.001). The median delay between the onset of chronic pancreatitis and persistent pain relief for both groups was 1.1 year (95% CI 0.7 to 1.6), as compared with 4 years (95% CI 3 to 4) for the natural history of chronic pancreatitis in a reference cohort (p<0.001).

Conclusions: ESWL is a safe and effective preferred treatment for selected patients with painful calcified chronic pancreatitis. Combining systematic endoscopy with ESWL adds to the cost of patient care, without improving the outcome of pancreatic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steer M L, Waxman I, Freedman S. Chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 19953321482–1490. - PubMed
    1. Ebbehoj N, Borly L, Bulow J.et al Evaluation of pancreatic tissue fluid pressure and pain in chronic pancreatitis. A longitudinal study. Scand J Gastroenterol 199025462–466. - PubMed
    1. Jalleh R P, Aslam M, Williamson R C. Pancreatic tissue and ductal pressures in chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1991781235–1237. - PubMed
    1. Karanjia N D, Widdison A L, Leung F.et al Compartment syndrome in experimental chronic obstructive pancreatitis: effect of decompressing the main pancreatic duct. Br J Surg 199481259–264. - PubMed
    1. Di Sebastiano P, Fink T, Weihe E.et al Immune cell infiltration and growth‐associated protein 43 expression correlate with pain in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 19971121648–1655. - PubMed

MeSH terms