Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD001530.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001530.pub2.

Nutritional support for head-injured patients

P Perel  1 , T Yanagawa, F Bunn, I Roberts, R Wentz, A Pierro
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Nutritional support for head-injured patients

P Perel et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Head injury increases the body's metabolic responses, and therefore nutritional demands. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is associated with improved outcome. The best route for administering nutrition (parenterally (TPN) or enterally (EN)), and the best timing of administration (for example, early versus late) of nutrients needs to be established.

Objectives: To quantify the effect on mortality and morbidity of alternative strategies of providing nutritional support following head injury.

Search strategy: Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Injuries Group specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Research Register, Web of Science and other electronic trials registers. Reference lists of trials and review articles were checked. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials of timing or route of nutritional support following acute traumatic brain injury.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Information was collected on death, disability, and incidence of infection. If trial quality was unclear, or if there were missing outcome data, trialists were contacted in an attempt to get further information.

Main results: A total of 11 trials were included. Seven trials addressed the timing of support (early versus delayed), data on mortality were obtained for all seven trials (284 participants). The relative risk (RR) for death with early nutritional support was 0.67 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.07). Data on disability were available for three trials. The RR for death or disability at the end of follow-up was 0.75 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.11). Seven trials compared parenteral versus enteral nutrition. Because early support often involves parenteral nutrition, three of the trials are also included in the previous analyses. Five trials (207 participants) reported mortality. The RR for mortality at the end of follow-up period was 0.66 (0.41 to 1.07). Two trials provided data on death and disability. The RR was 0.69 (95% Cl 0.40 to 1.19). One trial compared gastric versus jejunal enteral nutrition, there were no deaths and the RR was not estimable.

Authors' conclusions: This review suggests that early feeding may be associated with a trend towards better outcomes in terms of survival and disability. Further trials are required. These trials should report not only nutritional outcomes but also the effect on death and disability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Timing of intervention: early versus delayed, Outcome 1 Mortality at the end of follow‐up.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Timing of intervention: early versus delayed, Outcome 2 Poor outcome at the end of follow‐up.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Route of intervention: parenteral versus enteral, Outcome 1 Mortality at the end of follow‐up.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Route of intervention: parenteral versus enteral, Outcome 2 Poor outcome at the end of follow‐up.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Enteral nutrition: jejunal versus gastric, Outcome 1 Mortality at the end of follow‐up.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Comment in

References

References to studies included in this review

Borzotta 1994 {published data only}
    1. Borzotta AP, Pennings J, Papasadero B, Paxton J, Mardesic S, Borzotta R, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after severe closed head injury. Journal of Trauma 1994;37(3):459‐68. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Chiarelli 1996 {published data only}
    1. Chiarelli AG, Ferrarello S, Piccioli A, Abate A, Chini G, Berioli MB, et al. Total enteral nutrition versus mixed enteral and parenteral nutrition in patients at an intensive care unit. Minerva Anestesiologica 1996;62(1‐2):1‐7. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Grahm 1989 {published data only}
    1. Grahm TW, Zadrozny DB, Harrington T. The benefits of early jejunal hyperalimentation in the head‐injured patient. Neurosurgery 1989;25(5):729‐35. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Hadley 1986 {published data only}
    1. Hadley MN, Grahm TW, Harrington T, Schiller WR, McDermott MK, Posillico DB. Nutritional support and neurotrauma: a critical review of early nutrition in forty‐five acute head injury patients. Neurosurgery 1986;19(3):367‐73. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Minard 2000 {published data only}
    1. Minard G, Kudsk K, Melton S, Patton JH, Tolley EA. Early versus delayed feeding with an immune‐enhancing diet in patients with severe head injuries. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2000;24(3):145‐9. - PubMed
Nataloni 1999 {published data only}
    1. Nataloni S, Gentili P, Marini B, Guidi A, Marconi P, Busco F, et al. Nutritional assessment in head injured patients through the study of rapid turnover visceral proteins. Clinical nutrition 1999;18(4):247‐51. - PubMed
Rapp 1983 {published data only}
    1. Rapp RP, Young DB, Twyman D, Bivins BA, Haack D, Tibbs PA, et al. The favorable effect of early parenteral feeding on survival in head‐injured patients. Journal of Neurosurgery 1983;58(6):906‐12. - PubMed
Sacks 1995 {published data only}
    1. Sacks GS, Brown RO, Teague D, Dickerson RN, Tolley EA, Kudsk KA. Early nutrition support modifies immune function in patients sustaining severe head injury. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1995;19(5):387‐92. - PubMed
Suchner 1996 {published data only}
    1. Suchner U, Senftleben U, Eckart T, Scholz M, Beck K, Murr R, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition: Effect on gastrointestinal function and metabolism. Nutrition 1996;12:13‐22. - PubMed
Taylor 1999 {published data only}
    1. Taylor SJ, Fettes SB. Enhanced enteral nutrition in head injury: effect on the efficacy of nutritional delivery, nitrogen balance, gastric residuals and risk of pneumonia. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1998;11(5):391‐401.
    1. Taylor SJ, Fettes SB, Jewkes C, Nelson R. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Critical Care Medicine 1999;27(11):2525‐31. - PubMed
Young 1987 {published data only}
    1. Young B, Ott L, Haack D, Twyman D, Combs D, Oexmann JB, et al. Effect of total parenteral nutrition upon intracranial pressure in severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1987;67:76‐80. - PubMed
    1. Young B, Ott L, Twyman D, Norton J, Rapp R, Tibbs P, et al. The effect of nutritional support on outcome from severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1987;67(5):668‐76. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Hausmann 1985 {published data only}
    1. Hausmann D, Mosebach KO, Caspari R, Rommelsheim K. Combined enteral‐parenteral nutrition versus total parenteral nutrition in brain‐injured patients. A comparative study. Intensive Care Medicine 1985;11(2):80‐4. - PubMed

Additional references

Clifton 1984
    1. Clifton GL, Robertson CS, Grossman RG, Hodge S, Foltz R, Garza C. The metabolic response to severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1984;60(4):687‐96. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Deutsman 1986
    1. Deutschman CS, Konstantinides FN, Raup S, Thienprasit P, Cerra FB. Physiological and metabolic response to isolated closed‐head injury. Part 1: Basal metabolic state: correlations of metabolic and physiological parameters with fasting and stressed controls. Journal of Neurosurgery 1986;64(1):89‐98. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Glanville 2006
    1. Glanville JM, Lefebvre C, Miles JN, Camosso‐Stefinovic J. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2006;94((2)):130‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Jennett 1975
    1. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975;1:480‐4. - PubMed
Maynard 1991
    1. Maynard ND, Bihari DJ. Postoperative feeding. BMJ 1991;303(6809):1007‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Moore 1991
    1. Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, McArdle AH, Booth FV, Morgenstein‐Wagner TB, et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. The results of a meta‐analysis. Annals of Surgery 1992;216(2):172‐83. - PMC - PubMed
Norton 1987
    1. Norton JA, Ott LG, McClain C, Adams L, Dempsey RJ, Haack D, et al. Intolerance to enteral feeding in the brain‐injured patient. Journal of Neurosurgery 1988;68(1):62‐6. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Ott 1989
    1. Ott L, McClain C, Young B. Nutrition and severe brain injury. Nutrition 1989;5(2):75‐9. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Phillips 1988
    1. Phillips R, Ott L, Young B, Walsh J. Nutritional support and measured energy expenditure of the child and adolescent with head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1987;67(6):846‐51. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical Evidence of Bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408‐12. - PubMed
Weekes 1996
    1. Weekes E, Elia M. Observations on the patterns of 24‐hour energy expenditure changes in body composition and gastric emptying in head‐injured patients receiving nasogastric tube feeding. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1996;20:31‐7. - PubMed