A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
- PMID: 17054773
- PMCID: PMC1624826
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-78
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
Abstract
Background: The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. We conducted a systematic review of published studies on the psychometric properties of the BCTQ to determine the level of evidence on the instrument's validity, reliability and responsiveness to date.
Methods: A search of the databases Medline, CINAHL, AMED and PsychInfo was conducted to retrieve studies which investigated one or more of the psychometric properties of the BCTQ. Data abstraction was undertaken by the first two authors.
Results: Ten studies were retrieved which met the inclusion criteria. One study evaluated face and content validity (43 patients) eight studies assessed construct validity (932 patients), four studies tested reliability (126 patients) and nine studies assessed responsiveness (986 patients). Interpretability was evaluated in one study and acceptability in eight studies (978 patients).
Conclusion: The BCTQ is a standardised, patient-based outcome measure of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The evidence base of the psychometric properties indicates that the BCTQ is a valid, reliable, responsive and acceptable instrument and should be included as a primary outcome measures in future CTS trials.
References
-
- Scholten R, Gerritsen AAM, Uitdehaag BMJ, van Geldere D, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. The Cochrane Library. 2005;2
-
- Mueller M, Tsui D, Schnurr R, Biddulph-Deisroth L, Hard J, MacDermid JC. Effectiveness of hand therapy interventions in primary management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2004;17:210–228. - PubMed
-
- Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;114:1137–1146. - PubMed
-
- Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E. A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. [Review] [53 refs] Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;113:1184–1191. - PubMed
-
- Szabo RM. Outcomes Assessment in Hand Surgery: when are they meaningful? Journal of Hand Surgery - British Volume. 2001;26A:993–1002. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous