Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan 15;92(2):404-17.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.094235. Epub 2006 Oct 20.

Modeling electroporation in a single cell

Affiliations

Modeling electroporation in a single cell

Wanda Krassowska et al. Biophys J. .

Abstract

Electroporation uses electric pulses to promote delivery of DNA and drugs into cells. This study presents a model of electroporation in a spherical cell exposed to an electric field. The model determines transmembrane potential, number of pores, and distribution of pore radii as functions of time and position on the cell surface. For a 1-ms, 40 kV/m pulse, electroporation consists of three stages: charging of the cell membrane (0-0.51 micros), creation of pores (0.51-1.43 micros), and evolution of pore radii (1.43 micros to 1 ms). This pulse creates approximately 341,000 pores, of which 97.8% are small ( approximately 1 nm radius) and 2.2% are large. The average radius of large pores is 22.8 +/- 18.7 nm, although some pores grow to 419 nm. The highest pore density occurs on the depolarized and hyperpolarized poles but the largest pores are on the border of the electroporated regions of the cell. Despite their much smaller number, large pores comprise 95.3% of the total pore area and contribute 66% to the increased cell conductance. For stronger pulses, pore area and cell conductance increase, but these increases are due to the creation of small pores; the number and size of large pores do not increase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic of a spherical cell considered in this study. Locations of particular interest are indicated by labels: D (H), depolarized (hyperpolarized) pole, Db (Hb), border between electroporated and nonelectroporated region in the depolarized (hyperpolarized) part of the cell, E, cell equator. An arrow indicates the direction of the electric field E, polar angle θ measures the position along the cell circumference.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Time evolution of electroporation in a cell. (A) Transmembrane potential formula image at the locations indicated by labels. (B) Number of all pores Kθ at locations D, H, and Hb. There is only one pore at Hb, no pores at Db or E. Kθ of 104 corresponds to a pore density of 4.07 × 1013 pores/m2. (C) Radii formula image of 12 selected pores at the depolarized pole. (D) Maximum radii formula image at locations indicated by labels. The pore at location Db was created at 0.32 ms. Note the different timescales in panels A and B versus C and D. Dotted vertical lines in panels A and B indicate the start and the end of the pore nucleation stage.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Spatial distribution of electroporation in a cell. (A) Transmembrane potential formula image at times indicated in the legend. The dotted line is the steady-state potential that would have been achieved without electroporation. The times 0.51 and 1.43 μs are the start and the end of the pore nucleation stage. (B) Number of all pores Kθ and number of large pores formula image at 1 ms. Note the 10-fold difference in scales for Kθ and formula image. (C) Maximum radius formula image at the end of the nucleation stage (1.43 μs) and at 1 ms. (D) Membrane conductance Gθ at the times indicated in the legend. In panels AD, solid circles on the 1-ms plots indicate locations D, Db, E, Hb, and H (left to right).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Distribution of pore radii at 30 μs, 100 μs, and 1 ms. (A) Pores at the depolarized pole D. (B) Pores on the entire cell. Only large pores are included in the distributions and their number Klg is given on each panel. The total number of pores, K, is reported in the upper panels. Two lower panels of panel B cover only part of the range of pore radii; maximum radii rmax are reported in each panel. The bin width = 2 nm.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Postpulse evolution of the pores in a cell. The electric field has been turned off at 1 ms. (A) Radii formula image of 12 selected pores (seven large and five small) at the depolarized pole D. This panel is a continuation of Fig. 2 C. (B) Membrane conductance Gθ at the end of the pulse (1 ms, thin line) and after the pulse (1.5 ms, thick line). Solid circles on the 1.5-ms plots indicate locations D, Db, E, Hb, and H (left to right).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Asymmetry of the electroporation process. (A) Transmembrane potential over the depolarized and hyperpolarized hemispheres (overlaid). (B) Membrane conductance, Gθ, over the depolarized and hyperpolarized hemispheres (overlaid). In both panels, solid circles indicate the position of the pole D and the border Db; open circles indicate the pole H and the border Hb.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Transmembrane potential formula image at the equator of the cell. The dashed line indicates Vm = 0.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Dependence of cell electroporation on field strength. All results were collected at the end of a 1-ms pulse and apply to the whole cell. (A) Number of all pores (K) and number of small (Ksm) and large (Klg) pores. The lines corresponding to K and Ksm overlap. (B) Number of pores in large pore population shown on an expanded vertical scale. (C) Average radius (formula image) of the large pore population. The vertical bars indicate standard deviation. For clarity, the range of the field strengths was truncated to 50 kV/m; formula image continues at the same level beyond 50 kV/m. (D) Total area of pores reported as a fraction of the cell surface area. (E) Total conductance of the cell membrane. (F) Extent of electroporation in the cell measured by the polar radii θd and θh. To facilitate comparison with θd, the figure plots πθh. The lines labeled an-dep and an-hyp show the extent of electroporation estimated from Eq. 12 for the depolarized and hyperpolarized hemisphere, respectively. The legend in panel A applies also to panels B, D, and E. Dotted vertical line indicates the electric field of 40 kV/m, i.e., the default field-strength used throughout this article.

References

    1. Potter, H. 1988. Electroporation in biology: methods, applications, and instrumentation. Anal. Biochem. 174:361–373. - PubMed
    1. Sukharev, S. I., V. A. Klenchin, S. M. Serov, L. V. Chernomordik, and Y. A. Chizmadzhev. 1992. Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores. Biophys. J. 63:1320–1327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weaver, J. C., and Y. A. Chizmadzhev. 1996. Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 41:135–160.
    1. Dev, S. B., D. P. Rabussay, G. Widera, and G. A. Hofmann. 2000. Medical applications of electroporation. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28:206–223.
    1. Tekle, E., R. D. Astumian, and P. B. Chock. 1994. Selective and asymmetric molecular transport across electroporated cell membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:11512–11516. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources