Approaches to the evaluation of outbreak detection methods
- PMID: 17059615
- PMCID: PMC1626088
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-263
Approaches to the evaluation of outbreak detection methods
Abstract
Background: An increasing number of methods are being developed for the early detection of infectious disease outbreaks which could be naturally occurring or as a result of bioterrorism; however, no standardised framework for examining the usefulness of various outbreak detection methods exists. To promote comparability between studies, it is essential that standardised methods are developed for the evaluation of outbreak detection methods.
Methods: This analysis aims to review approaches used to evaluate outbreak detection methods and provide a conceptual framework upon which recommendations for standardised evaluation methods can be based. We reviewed the recently published literature for reports which evaluated methods for the detection of infectious disease outbreaks in public health surveillance data. Evaluation methods identified in the recent literature were categorised according to the presence of common features to provide a conceptual basis within which to understand current approaches to evaluation.
Results: There was considerable variation in the approaches used for the evaluation of methods for the detection of outbreaks in public health surveillance data, and appeared to be no single approach of choice. Four main approaches were used to evaluate performance, and these were labelled the Descriptive, Derived, Epidemiological and Simulation approaches. Based on the approaches identified, we propose a basic framework for evaluation and recommend the use of multiple approaches to evaluation to enable a comprehensive and contextualised description of outbreak detection performance.
Conclusion: The varied nature of performance evaluation demonstrated in this review supports the need for further development of evaluation methods to improve comparability between studies. Our findings indicate that no single approach can fulfil all evaluation requirements. We propose that the cornerstone approaches to evaluation identified provide key contributions to support internal and external validity and comparability of study findings, and suggest these be incorporated into future recommendations for performance assessment.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Outbreak detection through automated surveillance: a review of the determinants of detection.J Biomed Inform. 2007 Aug;40(4):370-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Oct 5. J Biomed Inform. 2007. PMID: 17095301 Review.
-
Performance indicators for response to selected infectious disease outbreaks: a review of the published record.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Sep-Oct;13(5):510-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000285205.40964.28. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007. PMID: 17762697 Review.
-
Estimating the joint disease outbreak-detection time when an automated biosurveillance system is augmenting traditional clinical case finding.J Biomed Inform. 2008 Apr;41(2):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.11.002. Epub 2007 Nov 21. J Biomed Inform. 2008. PMID: 18194876
-
A methodology to enhance spatial understanding of disease outbreak events reported in news articles.Int J Med Inform. 2010 Apr;79(4):284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Feb 13. Int J Med Inform. 2010. PMID: 20153972
-
Issues in applied statistics for public health bioterrorism surveillance using multiple data streams: research needs.Stat Med. 2007 Apr 15;26(8):1834-56. doi: 10.1002/sim.2793. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17221940
Cited by
-
A Bayesian Outbreak Detection Method for Influenza-Like Illness.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:751738. doi: 10.1155/2015/751738. Epub 2015 Sep 6. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26425552 Free PMC article.
-
Allocating limited surveillance effort for outbreak detection of endemic foot and mouth disease.PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jul 11;21(7):e1012395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012395. eCollection 2025 Jul. PLoS Comput Biol. 2025. PMID: 40644517 Free PMC article.
-
Adjusting outbreak detection algorithms for surveillance during epidemic and non-epidemic periods.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e51-3. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000126. Epub 2011 Aug 11. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012. PMID: 21836157 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the start week of respiratory syncytial virus outbreaks using real time weather variables.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Nov 2;10:68. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-68. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010. PMID: 21044325 Free PMC article.
-
Simulation-Based Evaluation of the Performances of an Algorithm for Detecting Abnormal Disease-Related Features in Cattle Mortality Records.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0141273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141273. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26536596 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Buehler JW, Hopkins RS, Overhage JM, Sosin DM, Tong V. Framework for evaluating public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks: recommendations from the CDC Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53:1–11. - PubMed
-
- Heino J, Toivonen H. Automated detection of epidemics from the usage logs of a physicians' reference database. In: Carbonell JG, Siekmann J, editor. Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2003. Vol. 2838. Berlin: Springer; 2003. pp. 180–91.
-
- Bravata DM, McDonald KM, Smith WM, Rydzak C, Szeto H, Buckeridge DL, Haberland C, Owens DK. Systematic review: surveillance systems for early detection of bioterrorism-related diseases. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:910–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources