Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;244(5):677-83.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000242707.44007.80.

The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review

Isabelle Jacquier  1 , Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, Carine Roy, Philippe Ravaud
Affiliations

The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review

Isabelle Jacquier et al. Ann Surg. 2006 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):table of contents

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers in randomized clinical trials.

Methods: Systematic review was performed to assess reports of randomized controlled trials assessing surgical procedure published in 2004. A standardized abstraction form was used to extract data.

Results: A total of 158 articles were included. Details on the intervention intended, such as the surgical procedure, were reported in 138 (87.3%) articles, anesthetic management in 56 (35.4%), preoperative care in 34 (15.2%), and postoperative care in 78 (49.4%). How the experimental surgical intervention was carried out was reported in 64 articles (40.5%). Most trials were conducted in single centers (n = 109, 69.0%). The setting was reported in only 11 articles, and the volume of interventions performed was only reported in 5. Selection criteria were reported for care providers in 64 articles (40.5%). The number of care providers performing the intervention was reported in 51 articles (32.2%). The quality of reporting was low as assessed by CLEAR NPT (a 10-items checklist specifically developed to assess the reporting quality of RCTs assessing nonpharmacologic treatment).

Conclusions: Inadequate reporting on the management of the surgical procedure, care providers, and surgery center may introduce bias in RCTs of surgical interventions, making their results questionable. We recommend extending the CONSORT Statement to surgical interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Selection of reports.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:1–143. - PubMed
    1. Chan A-W, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet. 2005;365:1159–1162. - PubMed
    1. McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, et al. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ. 2002;324:1448–1451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694–696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms