Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?
- PMID: 17062246
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.079
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) with continuous flow properties are increasingly used to bridge heart failure patients to cardiac transplantation. Advantages in comparison with the pulsatile LVADs are smaller size, better endurance, and lower thromboembolic events. However, whether these new pumps have similar pre- and posttransplant outcomes is not clear.
Methods: Fifty patients with a continuous flow device (Micromed DeBakey, Houston, TX or InCor BerlinHeart, Berlin, Germany) were compared with an age-, disease-, and LVAD duration-matched control group (n = 80) supported with a pulsatile device (Novacor, WorldHeart, Oakland, CA or HeartMate, Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA).
Results: Age (44.3 +/- 13.4 vs 46.1 +/- 11.1 years), disease (idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 58% vs 65%), and LVAD duration (138 +/- 131 vs 128 +/- 106 days) were comparable in both groups. Successful bridging to transplantation was similar with continuous flow in comparison with pulsatile device support (52% vs 56%, p = not significant [NS]). Thirty-day mortality after cardiac transplantation in patients with continuous flow LVAD support was 21.7% vs 22.2% with pulsatile LVADs (p = NS). Reasons for death were similar among the different LVAD groups. Long-term survival was similar in both LVAD groups compared with patients without previous LVAD support. Interestingly, severe rejections were significantly more frequent in patients with a continuous flow LVAD (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The new generation of cardiac assist devices with continuous flow pattern has a similar rate of pre- and posttransplant mortality in comparison with pulsatile LVADs. However, the rate and severity of posttransplant rejection was significantly higher in the group with continuous flow devices. Further studies are warranted to explain the higher rate of severe rejections.
Similar articles
-
Clinical outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricular assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Aug;34(2):275-80; discussion 280. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.019. Epub 2008 Mar 28. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18375138
-
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20447659
-
Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):1082-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.034. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17307463
-
State of the art: implantable ventricular assist devices.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009 Oct;14(5):554-9. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283303750. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19667990 Review.
-
Long-term continuous flow left ventricular assist device support and end-organ function: prospects for destination therapy.J Card Surg. 2010 Jul;25(4):490-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01075.x. J Card Surg. 2010. PMID: 20642766 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov;3(6):573-81. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.08.24. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 25512897 Free PMC article.
-
Physiologic effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.J Surg Res. 2016 May 15;202(2):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Jan 20. J Surg Res. 2016. PMID: 27229111 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous