Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jan;33(1):128-32.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0417-x. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

Control of tracheal cuff pressure: a pilot study using a pneumatic device

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Control of tracheal cuff pressure: a pilot study using a pneumatic device

Alexandre Duguet et al. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a simple mechanical device to maintain constant endotracheal cuff pressure (Pcuff) during mechanical ventilation (large encased inflatable cuff connected to the endotracheal cuff and receiving constant pressure from a heavy mass attached to an articulated arm).

Design and setting: Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover, pilot study in a medical intensive care unit.

Patients and participants: Nine consecutive mechanically ventilated patients (age 62+/-20 years, SAPS II score 39+/-15).

Interventions: Control day: Pcuff monitored and adjusted with a manometer (Hi-Lo, Tyco Healthcare) according to current recommendations (twice a day and after each intervention on the tracheal tube); initial target Pcuff 22-28 cmH20. Prototype day: test device connected to the endotracheal cuff; same initial target. Continuous Pcuff recording during both days. Control and prototype days in random order.

Results: Pcuff values over 50 cmH20 were recorded in six patients during the control day (178+/-159min), never during the prototype day. During the control day, Pcuff was between 30 and 50 cmH20 for 29+/-25% of the time, vs 0.3+/-0.3% during the prototype day (p<0.01). Pcuff was between 15 and 30 cmH20 for 56+/-36% of the time during the control day, vs 95+/-14% during the prototype day p<0.01). During the control day, Pcuff was below 15 cmH20 for 15+/-17% of the time, vs 4.7+/-15% during the prototype day (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The tested device successfully controlled Pcuff with minimal human resource consumption. Prospective studies are required to assess its clinical impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Chest Med. 2003 Sep;24(3):457-71 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesia. 1999 Oct;54(10):981-6 - PubMed
    1. Respir Care. 2005 Jul;50(7):900-6; discussion 906-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur Respir J. 2002 Oct;20(4):1010-3 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 1990 Dec;18(12):1423-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources