Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload
- PMID: 17063963
- DOI: 10.1518/001872006778606822
Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload
Abstract
Objective: Two experiments were conducted in which participants navigated a simulated unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) through a series of mission legs while searching for targets and monitoring system parameters. The goal of the study was to highlight the qualitatively different effects of automation false alarms and misses as they relate to operator compliance and reliance, respectively.
Background: Background data suggest that automation false alarms cause reduced compliance, whereas misses cause reduced reliance.
Method: In two studies, 32 and 24 participants, including some licensed pilots, performed in-lab UAV simulations that presented the visual world and collected dependent measures.
Results: Results indicated that with the low-reliability aids, false alarms correlated with poorer performance in the system failure task, whereas misses correlated with poorer performance in the concurrent tasks.
Conclusion: Compliance and reliance do appear to be affected by false alarms and misses, respectively, and are relatively independent of each other.
Application: Practical implications are that automated aids must be fairly reliable to provide global benefits and that false alarms and misses have qualitatively different effects on performance.
Similar articles
-
On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses?Hum Factors. 2007 Aug;49(4):564-72. doi: 10.1518/001872007X215656. Hum Factors. 2007. PMID: 17702209
-
Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis.Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):479-87. doi: 10.1518/001872005774860005. Hum Factors. 2005. PMID: 16435690
-
Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.Hum Factors. 2017 May;59(3):333-345. doi: 10.1177/0018720816682648. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Hum Factors. 2017. PMID: 28430544
-
A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management.Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:66-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 3. Appl Ergon. 2017. PMID: 27633199 Review.
-
Teaming humans and automated systems in safely engineered environments.Life Support Biosph Sci. 1998;5(4):453-60. Life Support Biosph Sci. 1998. PMID: 11871455 Review.
Cited by
-
Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):423-431. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw105. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27516495 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding reliance on automation: effects of error type, error distribution, age and experience.Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2014 Mar;15(2):134-160. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2011.611269. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2014. PMID: 25642142 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond Binary Decisions: Evaluating the Effects of AI Error Type on Trust and Performance in AI-Assisted Tasks.Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 19:187208251326795. doi: 10.1177/00187208251326795. Online ahead of print. Hum Factors. 2025. PMID: 40104968 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Trust, Self-Confidence, and Feedback on the Use of Decision Automation.Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00519. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30915005 Free PMC article.
-
It's Not Only What You Say, But Also How You Say It: Machine Learning Approach to Estimate Trust from Conversation.Hum Factors. 2024 Jun;66(6):1724-1741. doi: 10.1177/00187208231166624. Epub 2023 Apr 28. Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 37116009 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous