Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Oct 26:6:17.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-6-17.

Short-term effects of an educational intervention on physical restraint use: a cluster randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short-term effects of an educational intervention on physical restraint use: a cluster randomized trial

Anna R Huizing et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Physical restraints are still frequently used in nursing home residents despite growing evidence for the ineffectiveness and negative consequences of these methods. Therefore, reduction in the use of physical restraints in psycho-geriatric nursing home residents is very important. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of an educational intervention on the use of physical restraints in psycho-geriatric nursing home residents.

Methods: A cluster randomized trial was applied to 5 psycho-geriatric nursing home wards (n = 167 residents with dementia). The wards were assigned at random to either educational intervention (3 wards) or control status (2 wards). The restraint status was observed and residents' characteristics, such as cognitive status, were determined by using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) at baseline and 1 month after intervention.

Results: Restraint use did not change significantly over time in the experimental group (55%-56%), compared to a significant increased use (P < 0.05) in the control group (56%-70%). The mean restraint intensity and mean multiple restraint use in residents increased in the control group but no changes were shown in the experimental group. Logistic regression analysis showed that residents in the control group were more likely to experience increased restraint use than residents in the experimental group.

Conclusion: An educational programme for nurses combined with consultation with a nurse specialist did not decrease the use of physical restraints in psycho-geriatric nursing home residents in the short term. However, the residents in the control group experienced more restraint use during the study period compared to the residents in the experimental group. Whether the intervention will reduce restraint use in the long term could not be inferred from these results. Further research is necessary to gain insight into the long-term effects of this educational intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The percentage of psycho-geriatric nursing home residents restrained by group over time (n = 126).

References

    1. Hamers JPH, Strik W, Smulders DCA, Gulpers MJM, Lijnkamp LGAM. Het fixeren van bewoners in het verpleeghuis (Use of physical restraints with nursing home residents) Verpleegkunde. 2001;16:188–196.
    1. Hamers JPH, Gulpers MJM, Strik W. Use of physical restraints with cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;45:246–251. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02885.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koopmans RTCM. Beschermende maatregelen in een psychogeriatrisch verpleeghuis (Protective measures in a psycho-geriatric nursing home) Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1991;22:45–52. - PubMed
    1. Hamers JPH, Huizing AR. Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly? Z Gerontol Geriat. 2005;38:19–25. doi: 10.1007/s00391-005-0286-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hantikainen V. Physical restraint: a descriptive study in Swiss nursing homes. Nursing Ethics. 1998;5:330–345. doi: 10.1191/096973398675544069. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types