Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov 7;103(45):16666-71.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604379103. Epub 2006 Oct 26.

Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity

Affiliations

Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity

David L Hyten et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Soybean has undergone several genetic bottlenecks. These include domestication in Asia to produce numerous Asian landraces, introduction of relatively few landraces to North America, and then selective breeding over the past 75 years. It is presumed that these three human-mediated events have reduced genetic diversity. We sequenced 111 fragments from 102 genes in four soybean populations representing the populations before and after genetic bottlenecks. We show that soybean has lost many rare sequence variants and has undergone numerous allele frequency changes throughout its history. Although soybean genetic diversity has been eroded by human selection after domestication, it is notable that modern cultivars have retained 72% of the sequence diversity present in the Asian landraces but lost 79% of rare alleles (frequency </=0.10) found in the Asian landraces. Simulations indicated that the diversity lost through the genetic bottlenecks of introduction and plant breeding was mostly due to the small number of Asian introductions and not the artificial selection subsequently imposed by selective breeding. The bottleneck with the most impact was domestication; when the low sequence diversity present in the wild species was halved, 81% of the rare alleles were lost, and 60% of the genes exhibited evidence of significant allele frequency changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Distribution of the SNP minor allele frequencies for each of the four soybean populations.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the number of unique and shared SNPs among four soybean populations.

References

    1. National Research Council; Committee on Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. Washington, DC: Natl Acad Sci; 1972.
    1. Esquinas-Alcazar J. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:946. - PubMed
    1. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR. Science. 1997;277:1063–1066. - PubMed
    1. Wilcox JR. In: Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. Boerma HR, Specht JE, editors. Madison, WI: Am Soc of Agronomy, Crop Sci Soc of Am, Soil Sci Soc of Am; 2004. pp. 1–14. Vol Agronomy, no 16.
    1. Carter TE, Nelson R, Sneller CH, Cui Z. In: Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. Boerma HR, Specht JE, editors. Madison, WI: Am Soc of Agronomy, Crop Sci Soc of Am, Soil Sci Soc of Am; 2004. pp. 303–416. Vol Agronomy, no 16.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources