This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2006 Nov;176(5):1911.

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.044.

Circumcision-are you with us or against us?

PMID: 17070209
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.044

Editorial

Circumcision-are you with us or against us?

Jack S Elder. J Urol. 2006 Nov.

. 2006 Nov;176(5):1911.

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.044.

Author

PMID: 17070209
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.044

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Re: circumcision--are you with us or against us? J. S. Elder J Urol 2006; 176: 1911.
Schoen EJ. Schoen EJ. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):354-5; author reply 355. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.053. Epub 2007 May 15. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17507035 No abstract available.

Comment on

Cost analysis of neonatal circumcision in a large health maintenance organization.
Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, To TT. Schoen EJ, et al. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1111-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00399-X. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16469634 Review.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information