Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned
- PMID: 17070302
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.059
Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned
Abstract
Purpose: Robot assisted pyeloplasty is emerging as an effective tool for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the pediatric population. However, access needed for the procedure is difficult in the small abdominal cavity of an infant. We present our experience with infant robot assisted pyeloplasty, along with some lessons learned that render this procedure possible in these small patients.
Materials and methods: Nine children 3 to 8 months old (mean 5.6) underwent transperitoneal robot assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction using the da Vinci Surgical System. All patients underwent Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty without renal pelvis tapering. Outcome measures included operative time, length of hospital stay, and resolution of obstruction by ultrasonography and/or diuretic radionuclide imaging.
Results: All infants successfully underwent robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty without conversion to pure laparoscopy or open procedure. Mean operative time was 122.8 minutes, with a mean console time of 72.1 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.4 days. Of the 9 patients 7 (78%) had resolution of or improvement in hydronephrosis, while 2 had no evidence of obstruction based on followup diuretic renography.
Conclusions: Robot assisted pyeloplasty is a safe and effective option in the surgical treatment of infant ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of robotics in minimally invasive pediatric surgery.
Similar articles
-
Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Nov 20. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23174238
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months--is it technically possible?J Urol. 2006 Apr;175(4):1477-9; discussion 1479. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00673-7. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16516026
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.118. Epub 2012 Jul 20. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22819409
-
Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.Can J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(2):5099-108. Can J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20398449 Review.
-
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19519760 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1. Epub 2023 Mar 13. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36913057 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology.Pediatr Surg Int. 2008 Sep;24(9):973-7. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2208-7. Epub 2008 Jul 31. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008. PMID: 18668251 Review.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison between pediatric and adult patients-Japanese series.J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):151-157. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0633-5. Epub 2016 Aug 6. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 27495150
-
Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?Front Pediatr. 2019 Sep 25;7:352. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00352. eCollection 2019. Front Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31608264 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic surgery in pediatric urology.Asian J Urol. 2017 Jan;4(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Sep 6. Asian J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29264208 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources