Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries
- PMID: 17070590
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024
Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries
Abstract
Objective: To compare the visual outcomes and complication profiles of primary scleral-fixated intraocular lens (SFIOL) versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) implantation in cataract surgeries complicated by inadequate capsular support.
Design: Retrospective, interventional, comparative cases series.
Participants: Thirty-six eyes of 36 patients undergoing SFIOL implantation (group 1) and 46 eyes of 46 patients undergoing ACIOL implantation (group 2).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of a consecutive series of complicated cataract surgeries with primary SFIOL or ACIOL implantation.
Main outcome measures: Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraoperative and postoperative complications, if any, and postoperative corneal endothelial cell counts. A multiple linear regression model was constructed with postoperative BCVA as the dependent variable and with IOL group (SFIOL vs. ACIOL), preoperative BCVA, surgeon's operative experience, planned operation, and patient's age as independent variables.
Results: Fifty-eight percent (group 1) and 37% (group 2) of patients underwent phacoemulsification, whereas the rest underwent extracapsular cataract extraction. The mean postoperative follow-up was 33.4+/-17.9 months (range, 6-61 months). Postoperative Snellen BCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 47.2% (group 1) and 71.7% (group 2) of patients (P = 0.038). Regression analysis showed that primary ACIOL implantation was associated with a significantly better postoperative BCVA of -0.157 on the logarithm of minimum angle of resolution scale (95% confidence interval, -0.306 to -0.007; P = 0.040), compared with primary SFIOL implantation. Although both the number of eyes with complications and the total number of complications were higher in the SFIOL group, the differences in early (P = 0.073) and late (P = 0.377) complications were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The results indicate that satisfactory results are achieved with primary implantation of current open-loop ACIOLs during cataract surgery complicated by loss of posterior capsule integrity. Eyes with these IOLs fared better than a cohort of eyes undergoing SFIOL implantation in a similar situation, at intermediate-term follow-up. Further prospective clinical trials with longer follow-up may help to evaluate the long-term visual outcomes and complication profiles after primary implantation of these lenses.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of outcomes of primary anterior chamber versus secondary scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries.Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;159(2):221-6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25448990
-
[Long-term follow-up of flexible open-loop anterior chamber intraocular lenses implantation].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 May;42(5):391-5. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16762230 Chinese.
-
Anterior chamber and sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses in eyes with poor capsular support.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 May;31(5):903-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.061. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005. PMID: 15975454
-
[Secondary intraocular lens implantation: methods and complications].J Fr Ophtalmol. 2000 Jan;23(1):73-80. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2000. PMID: 10733359 Review. French.
-
Intraocular lens implantation in leprosy.Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 2002 Mar;70(1):9-15. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 2002. PMID: 12120043 Review.
Cited by
-
Trans-Scleral Plugs Fixated FIL SSF IOL: A Review of the Literature and Comparison with Other Secondary IOL Implants.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1994. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051994. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scleral-fixated IOLs - A comprehensive review of current practices and emerging trends.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):933-945. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2812_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40586185 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reinforced scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens by double sutures: comparison with intrascleral intraocular lens fixation.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;62(3):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0579-4. Epub 2018 Feb 20. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29464488
-
Implantation of a double iris-claw intraocular lens in an aphakic nanophthalmic eye.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;65(12):1490-1492. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_441_17. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29208842 Free PMC article.
-
Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: Anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;64(1):45-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.178139. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26953023 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical