Regional economic impacts of Grand Canyon river runners
- PMID: 17070647
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.012
Regional economic impacts of Grand Canyon river runners
Abstract
Economic impact analysis (EIA) of outdoor recreation can provide critical social information concerning the utilization of natural resources. Outdoor recreation and other non-consumptive uses of resources are viewed as environmentally friendly alternatives to extractive-type industries. While outdoor recreation can be an appropriate use of resources, it generates both beneficial and adverse socioeconomic impacts on rural communities. The authors used EIA to assess the regional economic impacts of rafting in Grand Canyon National Park. The Grand Canyon region of northern Arizona represents a rural US economy that is highly dependent upon tourism and recreational expenditures. The purpose of this research is twofold. The first is to ascertain the previously unknown regional economic impacts of Grand Canyon river runners. The second purpose is to examine attributes of these economic impacts in terms of regional multipliers, leakage, and types of employment created. Most of the literature on economic impacts of outdoor recreation has focused strictly on the positive economic impacts, failing to illuminate the coinciding adverse and constraining economic impacts. Examining the attributes of economic impacts can highlight deficiencies and constraints that limit the economic benefits of recreation and tourism. Regional expenditure information was obtained by surveying non-commercial boaters and commercial outfitters. The authors used IMPLAN input-output modeling to assess direct, indirect, and induced effects of Grand Canyon river runners. Multipliers were calculated for output, employment, and income. Over 22,000 people rafted on the Colorado River through Grand Canyon National Park in 2001, resulting in an estimated $21,100,000 of regional expenditures to the greater Grand Canyon economy. However, over 50% of all rafting-related expenditures were not captured by the regional economy and many of the jobs created by the rafting industry are lower-wage and seasonal. Policy recommendations are given for increasing the regional retention of rafting expenditures and for understanding both the beneficial and adverse impacts that accompany outdoor recreation in rural areas.
Similar articles
-
Attitudes of stakeholders towards the Podyji/Thaya River Basin National Park in the Czech Republic.J Environ Manage. 2006 Nov;81(3):273-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.002. Epub 2006 Mar 23. J Environ Manage. 2006. PMID: 16549229
-
Brighty, donkeys and conservation in the Grand Canyon.Endeavour. 2006 Sep;30(3):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Aug 14. Endeavour. 2006. PMID: 16904748
-
Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region, Florida.J Environ Manage. 2007 Dec;85(4):977-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.014. Epub 2007 Feb 1. J Environ Manage. 2007. PMID: 17275161
-
Recreational impacts on the fauna of Australian coastal marine ecosystems.J Environ Manage. 2010 Nov;91(11):2096-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 7. J Environ Manage. 2010. PMID: 20615603 Review.
-
Impacts of recreation and tourism on plant biodiversity and vegetation in protected areas in Australia.J Environ Manage. 2007 Dec;85(4):791-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.021. Epub 2007 Jan 17. J Environ Manage. 2007. PMID: 17234325 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptions of community benefits from two Wild and Scenic Rivers.Environ Manage. 2011 May;47(5):814-27. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9671-y. Epub 2011 Apr 11. Environ Manage. 2011. PMID: 21479920
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources