Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;47(10):1031-40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01673.x.

Reward-related decision-making in pediatric major depressive disorder: an fMRI study

Affiliations

Reward-related decision-making in pediatric major depressive disorder: an fMRI study

Erika E Forbes et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Although reward processing is considered an important part of affective functioning, few studies have investigated reward-related decisions or responses in young people with affective disorders. Depression is postulated to involve decreased activity in reward-related affective systems.

Methods: Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined behavioral and neural responses to reward in young people with depressive disorders using a reward decision-making task. The task involved choices about possible rewards involving varying magnitude and probability of reward. The study design allowed the separation of decision/anticipation and outcome phases of reward processing. Participants were 9-17 years old and had diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders, or no history of psychiatric disorder.

Results: Participants with MDD exhibited less neural response than control participants in reward-related brain areas during both phases of the task. Group differences did not appear to be a function of anxiety. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were associated with activation in reward-related brain areas.

Conclusions: Results suggest that depression involves altered reward processing and underscore the need for further investigation of relations among development, affective disorders, and reward processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of the reward task. The upper left panel depicts decision the stimuli, showing each of the four possible trial types. The upper right panel depicts outcome stimuli. The lower panel depicts trial timing. The complete trial consisted of a decision phase and an outcome phase, each lasting 12 s. Imaging data were acquired at 6 time points during each phase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Images showing significant main effects or interactions with group (p<.05, in red) in (a) anticipation/decision and (b) outcome phases. Blue regions were examined but not significant.

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1983.
    1. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–571. - PubMed
    1. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, et al. The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997;36:545–553. - PubMed
    1. Bjork JM, Knutson B, Fong GW, Caggiano DM, Bennett SM, Hommer DW. Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: Similarities and differences from young adults. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24:1793–1802. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bornert P, Aldefeld B, Eggers H. Reversed spiral MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance Medicine. 2000;44:479–484. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms