Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Nov;32(11):635-8.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013532.

The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices

Affiliations
Review

The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices

M W Foster et al. J Med Ethics. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Among bioethicists and members of the public, genetics is often regarded as unique in its ethical challenges. As medical researchers and clinicians increasingly combine genetic information with a range of non-genetic information in the study and clinical management of patients with common diseases, the unique ethical challenges attributed to genetics must be re-examined. A process of genetic routinisation that will have implications for research and clinical ethics, as well as for public conceptions of genetic information, is constituted by the emergence of new forms of genetic medicine, in which genetic information is interpreted in a multifactorial frame of reference. Although the integration of genetics in medical research and treatment may be a helpful corrective to the mistaken assumptions of genetic essentialism or determinism, the routinisation of genetics may have unintended consequences for the protection of genetic information, perceptions of non-genetic information and the loss of genetic research as a laboratory for exploring issues in research and clinical ethics. Consequently, new ethical challenges are presented by the increasing routinisation of genetic information in both biomedical and public spheres.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Collins F S, McKusick V A. Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. JAMA 2001285540–544. - PubMed
    1. Guttmacher A, Collins F S. Genomic medicine – a primer. N Engl J Med 20023471512–1521. - PubMed
    1. Caporaso N E. Why have we failed to find the low penetrance genetic constituents of common cancers? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002111544–1549. - PubMed
    1. Collins F S, Green E D, Guttmacher A E.et al A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 2003422835–847. - PubMed
    1. Collins F S. The case for a U.S. prospective cohort study of genes and environment. Nature 2004429475–477. - PubMed

Publication types