Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct-Dec;31(4):337-46.
doi: 10.1097/00004010-200610000-00009.

Connection, regulation, and care plan innovation: a case study of four nursing homes

Affiliations

Connection, regulation, and care plan innovation: a case study of four nursing homes

Cathleen S Colón-Emeric et al. Health Care Manage Rev. 2006 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

We describe how connections among nursing home staff impact the care planning process using a complexity science framework. We completed six-month case studies of four nursing homes. Field observations (n = 274), shadowing encounters (n = 69), and in-depth interviews (n = 122) of 390 staff at all levels were conducted. Qualitative analysis produced a conceptual/thematic description and complexity science concepts were used to produce conceptual insights. We observed that greater levels of staff connection were associated with higher care plan specificity and innovation. Connection of the frontline nursing staff was crucial for (1) implementation of the formal care plan and (2) spontaneous informal care planning responsive to changing resident needs. Although regulations could theoretically improve cognitive diversity and information flow in care planning, we observed instances of regulatory oversight resulting in less specific care plans and abandonment of an effective care planning process. Interventions which improve staff connectedness may improve resident outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Conceptual Model of how System Parameters Impact Care planning Process
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Connection Maps for the four Study Facilities. “Other Disciplines” Includes Rehabilitation, Dietary, Social Work, and Activities Staff. “Medical Team” Includes Attending Physicians, Psychiatrists, and Nurse Practitioners. “Care Plan Team” Includes MDS Nurses and any Other Team Members Assigned in That Facility, Often Social Work and Activities. “Frontline Nursing Staff” Includes floor Nurses (Generally LPNs) And CNAs. Arrows Between Boxes Indicate Connection, Information Flow, and Cognitive Diversity Between Group Members

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dellefield ME. Interdisciplinary care planning and the written care plan in nursing homes: a critical review. Gerontologist. 2006;46(1):128–33. - PubMed
    1. Hawes C, Mor V, Phillips CD, Fries BE, Morris JN, Steele-Friedlob E, et al. The OBRA-87 Nursing Home Regulations and Implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Effects on Process Quality. Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 1997;45:977–85. - PubMed
    1. Hawes C, Morris J, Phillips C, Fries B, Murhpy K, Mor V. Development of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) in the US. Age & Ageing. 1997;26(S2):19–26. - PubMed
    1. Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE, Phillips CD, Mor V, Katz S, et al. Designing the National Resident Assessment Instrument for Nursing Homes. Gerontologist. 1990;30:293–307. - PubMed
    1. Piven M, Ammarell N, Bailey D, Corazzini K, Colón-Emeric C, Lekan-Rutledge D, et al. MDS Coordinator Relationships and Nursing Home Processes. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2006;28:294–309. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types