Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study
- PMID: 17081915
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X
Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study
Abstract
Background: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are used as standard practice in trials of cancer treatments by clinicians to elicit and report toxic effects. Alternatively, patients could report this information directly as patient-reported outcomes, but the accuracy of these reports compared with clinician reports remains unclear. We aimed to compare the reporting of symptom severity reported by patients and clinicians.
Methods: Between March and May, 2005, a questionnaire with 11 common CTCAE symptoms was given to consecutive outpatients and their clinicians (physicians and nurses) in lung and genitourinary cancer clinics in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Patients completed a version that used language adapted from the CTCAE for patient self-reporting. The results from the questionnaire were compared with clinician reporting of the same symptoms.
Findings: Of 435 patients and their clinicians asked to take part in the study, 400 paired surveys were completed. For most symptoms, agreement between patient and clinician was high, and most discrepancies were within a grade difference of one point. Agreement was higher for symptoms that could be observable directly, such as vomiting and diarrhoea, than for more subjective symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnoea. Differences in symptom reporting rarely would have changed treatment decisions or dosing, and patients assigned greater severity to symptoms more than did clinicians. No significant differences were recorded between the results when the questionnaire was completed by the patient before or after the clinician.
Interpretation: Patient reporting of symptoms could add to the current approach to symptom monitoring in cancer treatment trials. Future research should assess the effect of self reporting on clinical outcomes and efficiency, and the use of real-time collection of patient-reported outcomes for early detection of potentially serious adverse events.
Comment in
-
Rising importance of patient-reported outcomes.Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):883-4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70914-7. Lancet Oncol. 2006. PMID: 17081911 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clinician versus nurse symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during chemotherapy: results of a comparison based on patient's self-reported questionnaire.Ann Oncol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1929-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp287. Epub 2009 Jul 17. Ann Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19622510
-
Self-evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy-Related Adverse Effects by Patients With Breast Cancer.JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):445-52. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4720. JAMA Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26720497
-
Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):910-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334. Epub 2015 Jan 26. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25624439 Clinical Trial.
-
Supporting quality and patient safety in cancer clinical trials.Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Jun;15(3):263-5. doi: 10.1188/11.CJON.263-265. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21624861 Review.
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:67-73. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159514. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016. PMID: 27249687 Review.
Cited by
-
Oral Problems in Oncology Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Solid Tumors: A Prospective Observational Study.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;16(1):176. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010176. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38201603 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of implementing patient-reported outcome measures into routine breast cancer care delivery using a novel collection and reporting platform.JAMIA Open. 2023 Dec 26;6(4):ooad108. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad108. eCollection 2023 Dec. JAMIA Open. 2023. PMID: 38149101 Free PMC article.
-
Patient self-reports of symptoms and clinician ratings as predictors of overall cancer survival.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 21;103(24):1851-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr485. Epub 2011 Dec 7. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 22157640 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of Participation in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Data Capture Components of NRG Oncology Clinical Trials.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):950-959. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jun 24. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020. PMID: 32590048 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores.Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;27(1):45-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07752-7. Epub 2019 Aug 28. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31463699 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
