Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK?
- PMID: 17081919
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70940-8
Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK?
Abstract
Cancer care can be complex, and given the wide range and numbers of health-care professionals involved, an enormous potential for poor coordination and miscommunication exists. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) should improve coordination, communication, and decision making between health-care team members and patients, and hopefully produce more positive outcomes. This review describes the many practical barriers to the successful implementation of MDT working, and shows that despite an increase in the delivery of cancer services via this method, research showing the effectiveness of MDT working is scarce.
Comment in
-
Multidisciplinary team meetings: where is the value?Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):886-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70916-0. Lancet Oncol. 2006. PMID: 17081913 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership?J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01507.x. Epub 2010 Jul 27. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 20666886
-
Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 May;20(5):1408-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2676-9. Epub 2012 Oct 20. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23086306
-
Effective cancer treatment by multidisciplinary teams.Pol Przegl Chir. 2012 Jul;84(7):371-6. doi: 10.2478/v10035-012-0063-7. Pol Przegl Chir. 2012. PMID: 22935461 Review. No abstract available.
-
Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science.Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):291-296. doi: 10.1071/AH16052. Aust Health Rev. 2017. PMID: 27372543
-
Multidisciplinary team meetings: where is the value?Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):886-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70916-0. Lancet Oncol. 2006. PMID: 17081913 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
What the cardiothoracic surgeon wants to know from the radiologist: from X-ray reporting to imaging consultancy and Heart Team membership.Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Jan;45(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3151-5. Epub 2015 Jan 1. Pediatr Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25552388
-
Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;27(10):1275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1440-8. Epub 2012 Mar 8. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012. PMID: 22395659
-
How I treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older adolescents and young adults.Blood. 2015 Jun 11;125(24):3702-10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-551481. Epub 2015 Mar 24. Blood. 2015. PMID: 25805810 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2023 Dec 29;31(1):183-202. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31010012. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38248097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The perceptions of Australian oncologists about cognitive changes in cancer survivors.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4679-87. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3315-y. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27320905
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources