Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis
- PMID: 17084927
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.218
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Background: Home-based cardiac rehabilitation offers an alternative to traditional, hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Aim: To compare the cost effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation and hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Methods: 104 patients with an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction and without major comorbidity were randomized to receive home-based rehabilitation (n=60) i.e. nurse facilitated, self-help package of 6 weeks' duration (the Heart Manual) or hospital-based rehabilitation for 8-10 weeks (n=44). Complete economic data were available in 80 patients (48 who received home-based rehabilitation and 32 who received hospital-based rehabilitation). Healthcare costs, patient costs, and quality of life (EQ-5D4.13) were assessed over the 9 months of the study.
Results: The cost of running the home-based rehabilitation programme was slightly lower than that of the hospital-based programme (mean (95% confidence interval) difference - 30 pounds sterling (- 45 pounds sterling to - 12 pounds sterling) [-44 euro, -67 euro to -18 euro] per patient. The cost difference was largely the result of reduced personnel costs. Over the 9 months of the study, no significant difference was seen between the two groups in overall healthcare costs (78 pounds sterling, - 1102 pounds sterling to 1191 pounds sterling [-115 euro, -1631 euro to -1763 euro] per patient) or quality adjusted life-years (-0.06 (-0.15 to 0.02)). The lack of significant difference between home-based rehabilitation and hospital-based rehabilitation did not alter when different costs and different methods of analysis were used.
Conclusions: The health gain and total healthcare costs of the present hospital-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes for patients after myocardial infarction appear to be similar. These initial results require affirmation by further economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation in different settings.
Similar articles
-
Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A randomized trial with preference arms--Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS).Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;119(2):202-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.018. Epub 2006 Dec 28. Int J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17196274 Clinical Trial.
-
Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):608-15. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328304fec1. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008. PMID: 18800005 Clinical Trial.
-
The incremental cost effectiveness of in-patient versus out-patient rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty - results of a pilot investigation.Eur J Med Res. 2008 Jun 24;13(6):267-74. Eur J Med Res. 2008. PMID: 18558552
-
The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Sep;11(35):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta11350. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17767899 Review.
-
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation: is it cost-effective?Eur Heart J. 1998 Nov;19 Suppl O:O42-50. Eur Heart J. 1998. PMID: 9857950 Review.
Cited by
-
A cost-utility analysis of nursing intervention via telephone follow-up for injured road users.BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 11;9:98. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-98. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. PMID: 19515265 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 30;6(6):CD007130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007130.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10:CD007130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007130.pub5. PMID: 28665511 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Comparison of Obesity Related Index and Exercise Capacity Between Center-Based and Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs.Ann Rehabil Med. 2019 Jun;43(3):297-304. doi: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.3.297. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019. PMID: 31311251 Free PMC article.
-
Using a Combined Platform of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms and GIS to Provide Land Suitability Maps for Locating Cardiac Rehabilitation Defibrillators.Iran J Public Health. 2015 Aug;44(8):1072-83. Iran J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26587471 Free PMC article.
-
The role of clinical and geographic factors in the use of hospital versus home-based cardiac rehabilitation.Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Sep;35(3):220-6. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328353e375. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012. PMID: 22561240 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical