Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis
- PMID: 17085168
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.012
Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis
Abstract
Purpose: We determined the long-term mechanical reliability of the AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis in men with organic erectile dysfunction.
Materials and methods: A total of 455 consecutive patients underwent implantation of an AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis between April 1986 and July 2004. Using telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires we obtained followup on 380 of 455 patients (83%). Data were obtained with regard to 2 end points, including overall failure and mechanical failure caused by any malfunctioning component.
Results: Followup was 0.49 to 231 months (median 91.5). Ten-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall and mechanical survival were 74.9% (95% CI 69.2 to 81.1) and 81.3% (95% CI 75.7 to 87.3), respectively.
Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the longest followup of any inflatable penile prosthesis showing overall and mechanical survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Similar articles
-
Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.J Urol. 1997 Oct;158(4):1400-2. J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9302130
-
AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up.J Sex Med. 2010 Jul;7(7):2602-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01801.x. Epub 2010 Apr 1. J Sex Med. 2010. PMID: 20384938
-
Mechanical failure of the American Medical Systems Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis: before and after 1993 structural modification.J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2502-6. J Urol. 2002. PMID: 11992067
-
Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection.Int J Impot Res. 2003 Oct;15 Suppl 5:S139-46. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901091. Int J Impot Res. 2003. PMID: 14551594 Review.
-
Long-term results of penile prosthetic implants.Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Nov;22(4):847-56. Urol Clin North Am. 1995. PMID: 7483133 Review.
Cited by
-
Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after 955 procedures.World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):591-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0859-4. Epub 2012 Mar 29. World J Urol. 2013. PMID: 22457032
-
Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Jun;15(6):413. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0413-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2014. PMID: 24740273 Review.
-
Penile implant surgery-managing complications.Fac Rev. 2021 Sep 24;10:73. doi: 10.12703/r/10-73. eCollection 2021. Fac Rev. 2021. PMID: 34632459 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction.Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Nov;6(Suppl 5):S832-S848. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.06.07. Transl Androl Urol. 2017. PMID: 29238663 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Penile prosthesis surgery in the management of erectile dysfunction.Arab J Urol. 2013 Sep;11(3):245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Arab J Urol. 2013. PMID: 26558089 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous