Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Dec;16(4):557-78.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9053-0.

Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain

Ivan A Steenstra et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a return to work (RTW) program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain (LBP), comparing a workplace intervention implemented between 2 to 8 weeks of sick-leave with usual care, and a clinical intervention after 8 weeks of sick-leave with usual care.

Design: Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Study population: Workers sick-listed for a period of 2 to 6 weeks due to LBP.

Interventions: 1. workplace assessment, work modifications and case management). 2. physiotherapy based on operant behavioural principles. 3. usual care: provided by an occupational physician.

Outcomes: The primary outcome was return to work (RTW). Other outcomes were pain intensity, functional status, quality of life and general health. The economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (after 2-6 weeks on sick-leave), and 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks after the first day of sick-leave.

Results: The workplace intervention group returned to work 30.0 days (95% CI=[3.1, 51.3]) earlier on average than the usual care group at slightly higher direct costs (ratio of 1 day: 19 euro). Workers in the clinical intervention group that had received usual care in the first 8 weeks returned to work 21.3 days (95% CI= [-74.1, 29.2]) later on average. The group that had received the workplace intervention in the first 8 weeks and the clinical intervention after 8 weeks returned to work 50.9 days (95% CI=[-89.4, -2.7]) later on average. A workplace intervention was more effective than usual care in RTW at slightly higher costs and was equally effective as usual care at equal costs on other outcomes. A clinical intervention was less effective than usual care and associated with higher costs.

Conclusion: The workplace intervention results in a safe and faster RTW than usual care at reasonable costs for workers on sick-leave for two to six weeks due to LBP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):285 - PubMed
    1. Phys Ther. 1992 Apr;72(4):279-90; discussion 291-3 - PubMed
    1. Appl Ergon. 2001 Feb;32(1):53-60 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(3):185-95 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Aug;31(4):249-57 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources