Reperfusion strategies. Comparison of facilitated versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Comment

Henry H Ting et al. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Summer.

. 2006 Summer;7(3):168-72.

¹ Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

No abstract available

Comment on

Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial.
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) investigators. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) investigators. Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):569-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68147-6. Lancet. 2006. PMID: 16488800 Clinical Trial.
Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials.
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Keeley EC, et al. Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68148-8. Lancet. 2006. PMID: 16488801 Review.