Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006;33(3):133-9.

The infertile male--diagnosis

  • PMID: 17089573
Review

The infertile male--diagnosis

J H Check. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2006.

Abstract

Purpose: To discuss a variety of tests used to diagnose the subfertile male and to impart based on clinical experience, reading, and personal research, this editor's view of the relative value of these tests.

Methods: The tests discussed include motile density, sperm morphology, the hypo-osmotic swelling test, antisperm antibodies, sperm chromatin structure assay, DNA integrity tests, reactive oxygen species, sperm penetration assay, sperm-zona pellucida binding tests, sperm creatine kinase activity, plasma membrane mannose-ligand receptor assay, and nuclear morphology.

Results: Except when extremely low (< 2.5 x 10(6)/ml) motile density does not identify the subfertile male very well. In contrast to other studies, my group's data suggest that neither low normal morphology by WHO standards or strict criteria identify the subfertile male. The best predictor of male subfertility is the hypo-osmotic swelling test when it is < 50%, which does not result in fertilization failure, but implantation failure. A high percentage of sperm coated by antisperm antibodies is very predictive of fertilization failure.

Conclusions: The physician must be careful when concluding that the male is subfertile or fertile based on standard tests of concentration, motility, and especially morphology.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources