Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;449(6):622-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0310-6. Epub 2006 Nov 8.

The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

Affiliations

The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

Burkhard Helpap et al. Virchows Arch. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

At an International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in 2005, the Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma underwent its first major revision. Gleason pattern 4 now includes most cribriform patterns and also fused and poorly formed glands. Our aims were to compare the grade distributions and assess the agreement between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens for the modified and conventional Gleason grading. More than 3,000 radical prostatectomy (RP), needle biopsies (NB) and transurethral resection specimens were assigned modified Gleason score (GS). In NB, modified GS 3 + 3 = 6 and 3 + 4 = 7a were almost equally common, while in RP, 3 + 4 = 7a was most common followed by 4 + 3 = 7b. After application of the modified GS on NB, a substantial shift in GS distribution occurred: The proportion of GS 6 and 7 were 48 and 26%, respectively, with conventional Gleason grading as compared to 22 and 68%, respectively, with modified grading. In 368 men, the agreement between NB and RP with a modified GS 6, 7a, 7b and 8-10 in NB was 28, 88, 68 and 64-100%, respectively. The overall agreement improved from 58 to 72% (p < 0.001) compared to conventional GS. The higher agreement with modified Gleason grading may facilitate therapeutic decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hum Pathol. 2005 Jan;36(1):5-9 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2002 Apr;89(6):538-42 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1974 Jan;111(1):58-64 - PubMed
    1. Hum Pathol. 1992 Mar;23(3):273-9 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):125-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources