Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists' finger tapping
- PMID: 17093990
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0760-8
Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists' finger tapping
Abstract
Movement sequences such as typing or tapping display important interactions among finger movements arising from anticipatory motion (preparing for upcoming events) and coupling (non-independence among fingers). We examined pianists' finger tapping for the influence of cognitive chunking processes and biomechanical coupling constraints. In a synchronization-continuation task, pianists repeatedly tapped four-finger sequences that differed in terms of the chunks that formed subsequences and in the transitions among physically adjacent or non-adjacent fingers. Chunking influenced intertap intervals, regardless of the particular fingers tapped; the final tap of each chunk was lengthened and less variable relative to other taps. The particular fingers tapped influenced peak finger heights, consistency of motion, and velocity-acceleration patterns, regardless of chunking. Thus, cognitive constraints influenced timing, whereas biomechanical factors influenced motion trajectories. These findings provide an important caveat for study of anticipatory motion by documenting the influence of biomechanical coupling on motion trajectories.
Similar articles
-
Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1252-1. Epub 2008 Jan 10. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18193412
-
Sequential and biomechanical factors constrain timing and motion in tapping.J Mot Behav. 2009 Mar;41(2):128-36. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.2.128-136. J Mot Behav. 2009. PMID: 19201683
-
Rate effects on timing, key velocity, and finger kinematics in piano performance.PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020518. Epub 2011 Jun 23. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21731615 Free PMC article.
-
Does the cerebellum provide a common computation for diverse tasks? A timing hypothesis.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;608:179-207; discussion 207-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48897.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990. PMID: 2075953 Review. No abstract available.
-
From Adult Finger Tapping to Fetal Heart Beating: Retracing the Role of Coordination in Constituting Agency.Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;10(1):18-35. doi: 10.1111/tops.12305. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Top Cogn Sci. 2018. PMID: 29105374 Review.
Cited by
-
Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1252-1. Epub 2008 Jan 10. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18193412
-
Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices' suboptimal timing?Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 28. Cognition. 2018. PMID: 29852424 Free PMC article.
-
Dissociable effects of practice variability on learning motor and timing skills.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193580. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29494670 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal and kinematic consistency predict sequence awareness.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):3025-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4704-7. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27324192 Free PMC article.
-
Fingers Phrase Music Differently: Trial-to-Trial Variability in Piano Scale Playing and Auditory Perception Reveal Motor Chunking.Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 16;3:495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00495. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23181040 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous