Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Nov 9:4:56.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-4-56.

Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review

Affiliations
Review

Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review

Juan Luis Alcázar. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) is a new imaging modality, which is being introduced into clinical practice. Although this technique will not probably replace two-dimensional ultrasound, it is being increasingly used. It has been reported that 3D US is a very high reproducible technique. The endometrium has been paid special attention when using this technique. The aim of this paper is to address some technical aspects of 3D US and to review critically its current status in evaluating endometrial function with special focus in its role in predicting pregnancy in assisted reproductive techniques. In spontaneous cycles endometrial volume grows during follicular phase remaining constant through the luteal phase. Endometrial vascularization increases during follicular phase peaking 2-3 days before ovulation, decreasing thereafter and increasing again during mid and late luteal phase. Data from studies analysing the role of 3D US for predicting IVF outcome are controversial. An explanation for these controversial findings might be different design of reported studies, specially the timing of ultrasound evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three-dimensional ultrasound depicting multiplanar display of the uterus. All three orthogonal planes can be displayed using this technique.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endometrial volume calculation by using the VOCAL software after three-dimensional ultrasound.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3D-Power Doppler indexes for assessing endometrial vascularization by means of the three-dimensional ultrasound.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Determination of the subendometrial area volume by using the "shell" facility. In this case 5 mm has been chosen.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Vascularization of the subendometrial area by 3D-Power Doppler. VI, FI and VFI refers to the shell area, not the endometrium.

References

    1. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1950;1:3–25. - PubMed
    1. Coulam CB, Bustillo M, Soenksen DM, Britten S. Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 1994;64:1004–1010. - PubMed
    1. Applebaum M. The uterine biophysical profile. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:67–68. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05010067.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zaidi J, Campbell S, Pittrof R, Tan SL. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:191–198. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06030191.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Remohi J, Ardiles G, Garcia-Velasco JA, Gaitan P, Simon C, Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2271–2276. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2271. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources