Does governance matter? Board configuration and performance in not-for-profit hospitals
- PMID: 17096640
- PMCID: PMC2690300
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00466.x
Does governance matter? Board configuration and performance in not-for-profit hospitals
Abstract
As performance accountabilities, external oversight, and market competition among not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals have grown, governing boards have been given a more central leadership role. This article examines these boards' effectiveness, particularly how their configuration influenced a range of performance outcomes in NFP community hospitals. Results indicate that hospitals governed by boards using a corporate governance model, versus hospitals governed by philanthropic-style boards, were likely to be more efficient and have more admissions and a larger share of the local market. Occupancy and cash flow were generally unrelated to hospitals' governing board configuration. However, effects of governance configuration were more pronounced in freestanding and public NFP hospitals compared with system-affiliated and private NFP hospitals, respectively.
References
-
- Alexander JA. Hospital Trusteeship in an Era of Institutional Transition: What Can We Learn from Governance Research? In: Jennings B, Gray B, editors. The Ethics of Hospital Trustees. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 2004. pp. 1–15.
-
- Alexander JA, Amburgey TL. The Dynamics of Change in the American Hospital Industry: Transformation or Selection. Medical Care Review. 1987;44:279–321. - PubMed
-
- Alexander JA, Lee S-YD, Bazzoli GJ. A Comparison of Governance Arrangements in Health Systems and Health Networks. Health Care Management Review. 2003;28:228–42. - PubMed
-
- Alexander JA, Lee S-YD, Weiner BJ, Ye Y. The Effects of Governing Board Configuration on Profound Organizational Change in Hospitals. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2006;47:291–308. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
