Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;38(8):2451-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.063.

Conversion to sirolimus in renal transplant patients with tumors

Affiliations

Conversion to sirolimus in renal transplant patients with tumors

A Sánchez-Fructuoso et al. Transplant Proc. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) is an option for renal transplant patients who develop a tumor. This strategy, however, may be associated with an increased risk of rejection.

Aim: We sought to evaluate a series of renal transplant patients who underwent conversion from CNI to SRL because they developed a tumor during the posttransplant period.

Methods: This prospective study of 29 patients included 2 patients with skin cancer (1 melanoma and 1 squamous cell carcinoma) and 27 patients who developed other tumors: lung (n = 6), prostate (n = 4), lymphoma (n = 2), colon adenocarcinoma (n = 2), kidney (n = 2), Kaposi sarcoma (n = 2), urothelium (n = 1), parotid (n = 1), larynx (n = 1), gastric (n = 1), breast (n = 1), tongue (n = 1), liver (n = 1), xanthoastrocytoma (n = 1), and aggressive angiomyxoma of the perineum (n = 1).

Results: CNI were withdrawn in 28 patients and reduced in the remaining patient. Renal function was better when CNI were rapidly or abruptly suspended, with maintenance of cyclosporine (CsA) + SRL for more than 3 months being especially detrimental. Proteinuria worsened in patients whose preconversion levels were >0.5 g/d, particularly those treated with CsA. There was no episode of rejection.

Conclusions: SRL is a promising option for the management of posttransplant tumors. The switch in immunosuppression should be undertaken quickly, especially in patients under treatment with CsA.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources