Protecting communities in health research from exploitation
- PMID: 17100008
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00501.x
Protecting communities in health research from exploitation
Abstract
Guidelines for health research focus on protecting individual research subjects. Yet several commentators have argued that protecting individual subjects, while undoubtedly important, is not sufficient to ensure ethical research. It is also vital to protect the communities involved in health research. In particular, a number of studies have been criticized on the grounds that they exploited host communities. Although these criticisms have received a good deal of attention, there has been no systematic analysis of what constitutes community exploitation in health research, nor an assessment of what safeguards are needed to protect against it. This is a serious deficiency. The absence of an analysis of community exploitation makes it impossible to ensure that host communities are protected against exploitation. The absence of an analysis also raises the possibility that charges of exploitation may block important research, without any way of assessing whether the charges are warranted. The present paper attempts to address these concerns by providing an analysis of community exploitation and, based on this analysis, determining what safeguards are needed to protect communities in health research against exploitation.
Comment in
-
'Fair benefits' accounts of exploitation require a normative principle of fairness: response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel et al.Bioethics. 2008 May;22(4):239-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00622.x. Bioethics. 2008. PMID: 18405322
Similar articles
-
Individualism and the ethics of research on humans.HEC Forum. 2004 Mar;16(1):6-26. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000031776.37723.98. HEC Forum. 2004. PMID: 15181667 No abstract available.
-
Minimizing Risks Is Not Enough: The Relevance of Benefits to Protecting Research Participants.Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(2):346-358. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0023. Perspect Biol Med. 2020. PMID: 33416657 Free PMC article.
-
What is owed to the community before, during and following research: an ethical dialogue.East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 1:S37-41. East Mediterr Health J. 2006. PMID: 17037687
-
Ethics and stem cell therapeutics for cardiovascular disease.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007 Jul-Aug;50(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2007.02.003. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007. PMID: 17631433 Review.
-
Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Dec;171(1):92-7. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1503-1. Epub 2003 May 28. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003. PMID: 12774188 Review.
Cited by
-
Stakeholder engagement in the development of genetically modified mosquitoes for malaria control in West Africa: lessons learned from 10 years of Target Malaria's work in Mali.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jan 5;11:1286694. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1286694. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 38249804 Free PMC article.
-
Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: a principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research.J Med Ethics. 2023 Jun;49(6):428-433. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108489. Epub 2022 Aug 3. J Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 35922120 Free PMC article.
-
Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research.BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n178. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 33593805 Free PMC article.
-
Involving Communities in Deciding What Benefits They Receive in Multinational Research.J Med Philos. 2015 Oct;40(5):584-600. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv017. Epub 2015 Jul 29. J Med Philos. 2015. PMID: 26224724 Free PMC article.
-
What's trust got to do with research: why not accountability?Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Nov 13;8:1237742. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1237742. eCollection 2023. Front Res Metr Anal. 2023. PMID: 38025960 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources