Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;20(6):675-84.
doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.675.

Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury

Affiliations

Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe et al. Neuropsychology. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

The authors used a predictable, externally cued task-switching paradigm to investigate executive control in a severe closed-head injury (CHI) population. Eighteen individuals with severe CHI and 18 controls switched between classifying whether a digit was odd or even and whether a letter was a consonant or vowel on every 4th trial. The target stimuli appeared in a circle divided into 8 equivalent parts. Presentation of the stimuli rotated clockwise. Participants performed the switching task at both a short (200 ms) and a long (1,000 ms) preparatory interval. Although the participants with CHI exhibited slower response times and greater switch costs, similar to controls, additional preparatory time reduced the switch costs, and the switch costs were limited to the 1st trial in the run. These findings indicate that participants with severe CHI were able to take advantage of time to prepare for the task switch, and the executive control processes involved in the switch costs were completed before the 1st trial of the run ended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Background display with example stimulus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean reaction times for the severe closed-head injury (CHI) and control groups plotted as a function of response–stimulus interval (RSI) and trial in run, with the first trial in the run representing the task switch. Error bars indicate standard error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allport DA, Styles EA, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umilta C, Moscovitch M, editors. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994. pp. 421–452.
    1. Allport DA, Wylie GR. Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task set. In: Humphreys GW, Duncan J, Treisman AM, editors. Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 273–296.
    1. Allport DA, Wylie GR. Task-switching, stimulus–response bindings, and negative priming. In: Monsell S, Driver J, editors. Attention and performance XVIII: Cognitive control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. pp. 35–70.
    1. Altmann EM. Advance preparation in task switching. Psychological Science. 2004;15:616–622. - PubMed
    1. Baddeley AD. Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1986.

Publication types