Imagery of different sensory modalities: hypnotizability and body sway
- PMID: 17103207
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0776-0
Imagery of different sensory modalities: hypnotizability and body sway
Abstract
Postural control in subjects with high (Highs) and low (Lows) susceptibility to hypnosis is differentially affected by changes in visual and neck tactile/proprioceptive input. The aim of the present experiment was to investigate whether imagery of the visual and tactile sensory modalities also induces different modulation of postural control in Highs and Lows. Fourteen Highs and 16 Lows were included in the study; they were recorded while standing upright with eyes closed during visual and tactile imagery tasks and during mental computation. Their posture and movement were recorded with an Elite System and their experience was assessed after each task in a structured interview. Visual imagery was judged "easier" than tactile imagery by Lows, while Highs performed both tasks easily and judged the tactile imagery less effortful and more vivid than Lows. No difference was observed for the mental computation. The Highs' body sway was not affected by the cognitive tasks, while Lows showed a task-related modulation of body sway. The results are in line with the hypothesis of lower vulnerability of Highs to the effects of tasks interfering with postural control and of different sensory-motor integration in Highs and Lows.
Similar articles
-
Postural effects of imagined leg pain as a function of hypnotizability.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Feb;216(3):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2935-1. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22080105
-
Is high hypnotizability a trouble in balance control?Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jan;108(1):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1280-6. Epub 2009 Nov 12. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010. PMID: 19908059
-
Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of postural control: effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Nov;191(3):331-40. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1526-2. Epub 2008 Aug 16. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18709367
-
Hypnotizability-related integration of perception and action.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Oct-Dec;25(7-8):1065-76. doi: 10.1080/02643290801913712. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008. PMID: 18608323 Review.
-
Hypnotisability and the Cerebellum: Hypotheses and Perspectives.Cerebellum. 2022 Dec;21(6):1025-1028. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01292-1. Epub 2021 Oct 15. Cerebellum. 2022. PMID: 34652583 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Postural effects of imagined leg pain as a function of hypnotizability.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Feb;216(3):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2935-1. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22080105
-
Modulation of the postural effects of cognitive load by hypnotizability.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Apr;194(2):323-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1740-6. Epub 2009 Mar 1. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19252902
-
The Role of Interoceptive Sensitivity and Hypnotizability in Motor Imagery.Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):832. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080832. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 39199523 Free PMC article.
-
Can imagery become reality?Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(3):329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2412-2. Epub 2010 Sep 17. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20848275
-
Hypnotizability-dependent accuracy in the reproduction of haptically explored paths.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(2):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2922-6. Epub 2011 Nov 6. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22057781
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical