Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy using the thoracoscopic approach
- PMID: 17103269
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9049-z
Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy using the thoracoscopic approach
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy allows dissection under direct vision, and therefore it potentially results in fewer complications than conventional transhiatal mobilization. In this article we report our experience with this approach. It was also hypothesized that a learning curve existed and that results have improved over time.
Patients and methods: From July 1994 until January 2004, 57 patients underwent pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy in our institution. Intraoperative events and postoperative outcome were prospectively documented, and long-term follow-up data were also studied. Results were compared between the first 30 patients and the last 27 patients.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the various clinicopathological characteristics. There was no difference in the median thoracoscopic time between the first 30 and last 27 patients at 90 and 75 min, respectively, p = 0.18. For the complete procedure there was significantly less blood loss in the later group; median (range) blood loss 700 (164-3000) ml versus 400 (100-1200) ml, p = 0.002. Overall pulmonary complications occurred in 12 patients (40%) in the first group versus 13 (48%) in the second group, p = 0.6. The incidence of atrial arrhythmia was also similar, affecting 6 (20%) patients and 3 (11%), respectively, p = 0.47. Hospital mortality rates were 13.3% and 7.4%, p = 0.67. Two-year survival rates were no different (46% versus 45% p = 0.85).
Conclusions: Although, subjectively, operating skills have improved over time, better results in the second half of this series could not be demonstrated clearly, likely because the operating surgeons had prior extensive experience in esophageal and thoracoscopic procedures.
Similar articles
-
Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Aug;70(2):418-22. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01402-8. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000. PMID: 10969655
-
Palliative gastric transposition following pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.Am Surg. 1997 May;63(5):410-3. Am Surg. 1997. PMID: 9128228
-
Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients.Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0963-8. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Surg Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20204415
-
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.12.004. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 15972176 Review.
-
Reconstruction of the pharyngoesophagus with voice restoration.Int J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug;10(4):243-6. doi: 10.1007/s10147-005-0512-y. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16136368 Review.
Cited by
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview.Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:119-24. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S40667. Epub 2013 Mar 3. Onco Targets Ther. 2013. PMID: 23493989 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical strategies for esophageal cancer associated with head and neck cancer.Surg Today. 2014 Sep;44(9):1603-10. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0713-3. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Surg Today. 2014. PMID: 23989943 Review.
-
Current management of cervical esophageal cancer.World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):600-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0876-7. World J Surg. 2011. PMID: 21161656
-
Clinical Assessment of Reconstruction Involving Gastric Pull-Up Combined with Free Jejunal Graft After Total Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2329-2336. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3948-0. World J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28462437
-
[Limitations of surgery for cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract].Chirurg. 2014 Mar;85(3):186-91. doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2598-5. Chirurg. 2014. PMID: 24526142 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical