Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Mar;21(3):461-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9005-y. Epub 2006 Nov 14.

Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess: is appendectomy always necessary after perforation of appendix?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess: is appendectomy always necessary after perforation of appendix?

E Zerem et al. Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The present study was designed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess.

Methods: In a prospective study, 50 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess > or = 3 cm in size were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received treatment with ultrasound guided-percutaneous drainage and i.v. antibiotics (ampicillin, cefuroxime, and metronidazole), and the other group received antibiotics only. Patient's baseline characteristics, duration of hospital stay, and treatment outcome and complications were analyzed.

Results: Appendectomy was avoided in 16/25 patients in the drainage group and 2/25 patients in the non-drainage group during follow-up with RR of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.22-0.62; p < 0.05). One patient in the drainage group and 8 patients in the non-drainage group underwent surgery in the first month after the beginning of treatment. Eight patients in the drainage group and 15 in the non-drainage group underwent interval appendectomy. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding patient demographics, abscess size, and pretreatment clinical symptoms. Hospital stay up to the subsidence of clinical and sonographic signs was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the drainage group, with a mean difference of 6.4 days (95% CI = 5.0-7.9; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Percutaneous drainage with antibiotics is a safe and effective way of treating acute perforated appendicitis. The recurrence rate for these patients is relatively low, and very often interval appendectomy is not required. For patients with periappendiceal abscess > or = 3 cm in diameter, antibiotic therapy alone is insufficient and the recurrence rate is high.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am Surg. 2003 Oct;69(10):829-32 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Oct;42(10):1325-9 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):923-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 2000 Mar;179(3):177-81 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):337-48 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources