[Cervical laminoplasty--review of surgical techniques, indications, methods of efficacy evaluation, and complications]
- PMID: 17103356
[Cervical laminoplasty--review of surgical techniques, indications, methods of efficacy evaluation, and complications]
Abstract
Techniques of expansive cervical laminoplasty evolved in the 1970s in Japan as an alternative to laminectomy connected with many complications. They were developed and modified in the following years. Nowadays cervical laminoplasty is the standard method of posterior decompression of the cervical spine which reflects the aspiration to preserve the spine stabilising structures. Indications for laminoplasty are multilevel cervical pathological changes leading to spinal canal stenosis and myelopathy as a consequence. Historical background is discussed. Technical details of Z-type laminoplasty (Oyama), open-door laminoplasty (Hirabayashi), spinous process-splitting laminoplasty (Kurokawa), hardware-augmented laminoplasty (O'Brien with Shaffrey's modification) and dorso-lateral decompression (Ohtsuka) are described. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale is widely accepted for the clinical evaluation of cervical myelopathy. Effectiveness of surgical treatment is evaluated using the Hirabayashi recovery rate. Postoperative complications are: diminution of neck motion range, kyphotic deformity, axial neck pain, C5 nerve root palsy, restenosis and late deterioration of neurological postoperative outcome. Contemporary theories explaining problems connected with the complications are described. The subject is discussed based on a review of literature and own practice.
Similar articles
-
[The dorsal approach in degeneratively changed cervical spine].Orthopade. 1996 Nov;25(6):533-41. doi: 10.1007/s001320050057. Orthopade. 1996. PMID: 8999408 Review. German.
-
Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.Neurosurgery. 2003 May;52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. Neurosurgery. 2003. PMID: 12699550
-
Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):2998-3005. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. PMID: 17172996
-
Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):E198-203. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828bb296. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013. PMID: 23511650
-
Cervical laminoplasty.Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6 Suppl):274S-281S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.023. Spine J. 2006. PMID: 17097547 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1594-602. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2741-5. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23508336 Free PMC article.
-
Vertebral plate and ligament composite laminoplasty in spinal cord tumor surgery: Analysis of 94 patients.Transl Neurosci. 2021 Jan 20;12(1):40-45. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2021-0007. eCollection 2021 Jan 1. Transl Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33552593 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of multi-level laminoplasty and laminectomy on the biomechanics of the cervical spine: a finite element study.Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:150-7. Iowa Orthop J. 2014. PMID: 25328475 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6. Epub 2018 Jan 15. Eur Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29335903
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous