The place of third-generation regimens in the treatment of adult aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- PMID: 1710488
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/2.suppl_1.37
The place of third-generation regimens in the treatment of adult aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Abstract
Diffuse large cell lymphoma, the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, has been known to be curable with combination chemotherapy for almost 20 years. Although occasional patients were cured with regimens like COP (cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone) the development of four-drug regimens made cure possible in a significant percentage of patients. Subsequently, newer, so-called third-generation regimens incorporated even more drugs with an apparent increase in the cure rate. However, the identification of important clinical and biologic features in the patient or the tumor that predict for treatment outcome (prognostic factors) has complicated comparison between nonrandomized and nonconcurrent trials. Recently, the Southwest Oncology Group presented data from pilot studies showing that patients treated with ProMACE-CytaBOM (procarbazine/methotrexate/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide- cytarabine/bleomycin/vincristine/methotrexate), m-BACOD (methotrexate-bleomycin/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dexa met hasone) , and MACOD-B (methotrexate/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dexamethasone- ble omycin) did not seem to do better than patients treated in the past with CHOP cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone). Also, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group has presented a study in which patients treated with a six-drug regimen did no better than those treated with a CHOP-like regimen. Some have interpreted these reports to mean that all patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma should receive CHOP, since they feel it to be safer. I believe this is not a good interpretation of the available data for the following reasons: (1) when administered at maximum tolerated doses, CHOP has the same approximate 5% treatment-related mortality seen with all regimens; (2) when CHOP is given at reduced (ie, safer) doses, it is not as effective; and (3) it is not yet clear that all patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma are the same in their response to treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404. N Engl J Med. 1993. PMID: 7680764 Clinical Trial.
-
Advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Analysis of prognostic factors by the international index and by lactic dehydrogenase in an intergroup study.Cancer. 1995 Feb 1;75(3):865-73. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950201)75:3<865::aid-cncr2820750319>3.0.co;2-z. Cancer. 1995. PMID: 7530168 Clinical Trial.
-
A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study.Ann Oncol. 1994;5 Suppl 2:91-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/5.suppl_2.s91. Ann Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7515652 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term follow-up of ProMACE-CytaBOM in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.Ann Oncol. 1991 Jan;2 Suppl 1:33-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/2.suppl_1.33. Ann Oncol. 1991. PMID: 1710487 Review.
-
Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin' lymphomas. Lessons from the past 10 years.Cancer. 1994 Nov 1;74(9 Suppl):2657-61. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+<2657::aid-cncr2820741812>3.0.co;2-t. Cancer. 1994. PMID: 7525045 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of autografting in lymphoma.Postgrad Med J. 1994 Jul;70(825):475-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.70.825.475. Postgrad Med J. 1994. PMID: 7937424 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Phase II study of paclitaxel in combination with mitoxantrone and ifosfamide/mesna for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after failure to cytarabine/cisplatin combination.Invest New Drugs. 1999;17(2):187-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1006383503022. Invest New Drugs. 1999. PMID: 10638491 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous