Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov-Dec;17(6):1545-50.
doi: 10.1021/bc060154p.

Rigid linkers for bioactive peptides

Affiliations

Rigid linkers for bioactive peptides

Josef Vagner et al. Bioconjug Chem. 2006 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Rigid linkers of variable length were used to connect two high-affinity Nle4-D-Phe7-alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (NDP-alpha-MSH) or two low-affinity MSH(4) ligands. The linked peptides were synthesized by solid-phase methods. Control experiments indicate there is little or no effect of these linkers on NDP-alpha-MSH or MSH(4) binding to the human melanocortin 4 receptor (hMC4R). Tethering two high-affinity ligands gave no binding enhancement, while tethering two low-affinity ligands resulted in binding enhancement that decreased with increased linker length. Furthermore, for the low-affinity ligands, the enhancement of affinity is inversely proportional to the estimated molecular moments of inertia. These results are consistent with a model wherein binding is enhanced when the rate of ligand reattachment to the receptor is fast relative to the rate of ligand diffusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rigid amino acid linkers 1–4 and N-protected derivatives 5–8.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dimeric and monomeric NDP-α-MSH compounds 32 and 33.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dimeric and monomeric MSH(4) compounds 3744.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative ligand binding curves generated through competitive ligand binding analysis compare the binding affinities of ligands 10 (□) and 13 (■). The calculated IC50 for 10 is 8 nM with an R2 value = 0.91 and for 13 10 nM with an R2 value = 0.93.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Binding of Linked MSH Ligands to hMC4R. State A: L1 is bound, L2 is unavailable for binding. State B: L1and L2 are unbound, L1 is positioned for binding. State C: L1and L2 are unbound, L2 is positioned for binding. State D: L2 is bound, L1 is unavailable for binding. State E: Compound is dissociated from cell surface (not shown).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Inverse correlation of compound binding affinity and linker length.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Solid-phase Synthesis of Compounds 9–11 Containing Linked NDP-α-MSH Ligands and Control Compounds 12–14
Reagents and conditions: (a) piperidine. (b) Fmoc/tBu solid-phase synthesis (Refs and 19). (c) N-protected linker (, , or 7), HOCt-DIC, DMF. (d) THF/MeOH/N2H4 (70/15/15). (e) pyridine/Ac2O (50/50). (f) CF3CO2H/HSCH2CH2SH/PhSMe/H2O (91/3/3/3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gillies RJ, Hoffman JM, Lam KS, Menkens AE, Piwnica-Worms DR, Sullivan DC, Weissleder R. Meeting Report: High-Throughput Technologies for In Vivo Imaging Agents . Molecular Imaging. 2005;4:98–103. - PubMed
    1. Gillies RJ, Hruby VJ. Expression-driven Reverse Engineering of Targeted Imaging and Therapeutic Agents. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2003;7:137–139. - PubMed
    1. Handl HL, Vagner J, Han H, Mash E, Hruby VJ, Gillies RJ. Hitting Multiple Targets with Multimeric Ligands. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2004;8:565–586. - PubMed
    1. Mammen M, Chio SK, Whitesides GM. Polyvalent Interactions in Biological Systems: Implications for Design and Use of Multivalent Ligands and Inhibitors. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:2754–2794. - PubMed
    1. Kiessling LL, Gestwicki JE, Strong LE. Synthetic Multivalent Ligands in the Exploration of Cell-surface Interactions. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2000;4:696–703. - PubMed

Publication types